Conclusion—Where Did We Go Wrong?

M. L. Schrad
{"title":"Conclusion—Where Did We Go Wrong?","authors":"M. L. Schrad","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190841577.003.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Having finished our history of prohibitionism, Chapter 18 asks: Where did our historical understandings go wrong? The chapter begins with the autumn years of Pussyfoot Johnson during the Great Depression, when prohibitionists had been thoroughly discredited. With the rise of Hayekian neoliberalism after World War II in the United States, any infringement on individual economic rights became understood as a necessary infringement on political rights too—which has made it difficult for contemporary historians to understand prohibitionism. In the 1950s and 1960s, Richard Hofstadter and Joseph Gusfield cast prohibition as solely a moral, religious issue, rather than a political or economic one, motivated by equal parts of “Marx, Jefferson and Jesus.” Ultimately, prohibitionism was a transnational normative shift about the inappropriateness of benefiting from addiction and misery of the masses, and an attempt to put the welfare of society ahead of the needs of the state.","PeriodicalId":356459,"journal":{"name":"Smashing the Liquor Machine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smashing the Liquor Machine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190841577.003.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Having finished our history of prohibitionism, Chapter 18 asks: Where did our historical understandings go wrong? The chapter begins with the autumn years of Pussyfoot Johnson during the Great Depression, when prohibitionists had been thoroughly discredited. With the rise of Hayekian neoliberalism after World War II in the United States, any infringement on individual economic rights became understood as a necessary infringement on political rights too—which has made it difficult for contemporary historians to understand prohibitionism. In the 1950s and 1960s, Richard Hofstadter and Joseph Gusfield cast prohibition as solely a moral, religious issue, rather than a political or economic one, motivated by equal parts of “Marx, Jefferson and Jesus.” Ultimately, prohibitionism was a transnational normative shift about the inappropriateness of benefiting from addiction and misery of the masses, and an attempt to put the welfare of society ahead of the needs of the state.
结束语:我们哪里做错了?
在结束了禁酒主义的历史之后,第十八章提出了一个问题:我们对历史的理解哪里出错了?这一章从大萧条时期Pussyfoot Johnson的秋天开始,当时禁酒主义者已经彻底失去了信誉。随着第二次世界大战后哈耶克式新自由主义在美国的兴起,对个人经济权利的任何侵犯都被理解为对政治权利的必要侵犯——这使得当代历史学家很难理解禁酒主义。在20世纪50年代和60年代,理查德·霍夫施塔特(Richard Hofstadter)和约瑟夫·古斯菲尔德(Joseph Gusfield)认为禁酒令仅仅是一个道德、宗教问题,而不是政治或经济问题,其动机是“马克思、杰斐逊和耶稣”的同等部分。最终,禁酒主义是一种跨国规范的转变,它认为从大众的成瘾和痛苦中获益是不恰当的,并试图将社会福利置于国家需求之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信