{"title":"Process control methodology for PSG and PETEOS films in a highly interactive multiprocess CVD system","authors":"H. Benson-Woodward, E. Hanson, S. Moreau","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.1995.484374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A step-by-step control methodology for targeting and controlling plasma enhanced tetraethylorthosilicate (PETEOS) and phosphosilicate glass (PSG) deposition processes in a single wafer PECVD chamber has been developed. Initially, PSG and PETEOS processes were characterized using two full factorial design of experiments processed through a single CVD reaction chamber utilizing RF power, TEOS ampule temperature, electrode spacing and TMP flow as the control factors, and deprate, film uniformity, film stress, and wt%phos content of the PSG film as responses. Based upon results obtained from the RS/1 analysis of both DOEs, additional experiments were processed to investigate the interactions of significant effects for both films. Using this information, a process control hierarchy was developed for the PETEOS process in the order of adjustment electrode spacing, TEOS ampule temperature and RF power to center PETEOS uniformity, deprate and stress. A similar hierarchy was developed for PSG. Generous limits were established to control the PSG process until long-term interactions between the two processes could be defined. Once these effects were characterized, a combined process methodology for both processes was developed, and PSG control limits for deprate were reduced by +/-50%. The final step was the organization of the combined methodology into a step-by-step procedure for targeting both PETEOS and PSG processes simultaneously. Benefits of this method of process control include increased compliance to SPC limits for both processes and a reduction in the amount of time required for problem troubleshooting.","PeriodicalId":237741,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop","volume":"109 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1995.484374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
A step-by-step control methodology for targeting and controlling plasma enhanced tetraethylorthosilicate (PETEOS) and phosphosilicate glass (PSG) deposition processes in a single wafer PECVD chamber has been developed. Initially, PSG and PETEOS processes were characterized using two full factorial design of experiments processed through a single CVD reaction chamber utilizing RF power, TEOS ampule temperature, electrode spacing and TMP flow as the control factors, and deprate, film uniformity, film stress, and wt%phos content of the PSG film as responses. Based upon results obtained from the RS/1 analysis of both DOEs, additional experiments were processed to investigate the interactions of significant effects for both films. Using this information, a process control hierarchy was developed for the PETEOS process in the order of adjustment electrode spacing, TEOS ampule temperature and RF power to center PETEOS uniformity, deprate and stress. A similar hierarchy was developed for PSG. Generous limits were established to control the PSG process until long-term interactions between the two processes could be defined. Once these effects were characterized, a combined process methodology for both processes was developed, and PSG control limits for deprate were reduced by +/-50%. The final step was the organization of the combined methodology into a step-by-step procedure for targeting both PETEOS and PSG processes simultaneously. Benefits of this method of process control include increased compliance to SPC limits for both processes and a reduction in the amount of time required for problem troubleshooting.