Recent trends in German co-determination: a critical assessment of new research evidence

Volker Telljohann
{"title":"Recent trends in German co-determination: a critical assessment of new research evidence","authors":"Volker Telljohann","doi":"10.3280/so2022-001004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to look at the developments in co-determination at workplace level as well as at the level of supervisory boards during and after the financial and economic crisis of 2007-2009. In Germany, co-determination is not only considered a way to develop industrial democracy, but also a way of increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of companies. Various studies show that co-determination contributes to the competitiveness of companies and that co-determined companies have also recovered from the financial and economic crisis more quickly. Although co-determination has a positive influence on the productivity, innovative capacity and competitiveness of companies, there is a growing number of companies that put in place strategies aimed at avoiding co-determination. However, despite the reduced spread of co-determination the German participation model has survived so far and is still part of the key institutional settings of German industrial relations. This is also due to the fact that the German co-determination system has always shown a remarkable capacity to adapt to new developments. The most recent examples in this regard are the Works Council Modernisation Act and the Act on Corporate Due Diligence in Supply Chains. That also means that basically co-determination has proved to be a stable yet flexible institution. Today, employee participation thus appears to be a helpful instrument for successfully managing transformation processes.","PeriodicalId":305932,"journal":{"name":"STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/so2022-001004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to look at the developments in co-determination at workplace level as well as at the level of supervisory boards during and after the financial and economic crisis of 2007-2009. In Germany, co-determination is not only considered a way to develop industrial democracy, but also a way of increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of companies. Various studies show that co-determination contributes to the competitiveness of companies and that co-determined companies have also recovered from the financial and economic crisis more quickly. Although co-determination has a positive influence on the productivity, innovative capacity and competitiveness of companies, there is a growing number of companies that put in place strategies aimed at avoiding co-determination. However, despite the reduced spread of co-determination the German participation model has survived so far and is still part of the key institutional settings of German industrial relations. This is also due to the fact that the German co-determination system has always shown a remarkable capacity to adapt to new developments. The most recent examples in this regard are the Works Council Modernisation Act and the Act on Corporate Due Diligence in Supply Chains. That also means that basically co-determination has proved to be a stable yet flexible institution. Today, employee participation thus appears to be a helpful instrument for successfully managing transformation processes.
德国共同决定的最新趋势:对新研究证据的批判性评估
本文的目的是研究在2007-2009年金融和经济危机期间和之后,在工作场所层面以及监事会层面共同决策的发展。在德国,共同决定不仅被认为是发展产业民主的一种方式,也是提高企业效率和竞争力的一种方式。各种研究表明,共同决策有助于提高公司的竞争力,共同决策的公司也能更快地从金融和经济危机中恢复过来。虽然共同决策对公司的生产力、创新能力和竞争力有积极影响,但越来越多的公司制定了旨在避免共同决策的战略。然而,尽管共同决定的传播减少了,德国的参与模式至今仍然存在,并且仍然是德国工业关系的关键制度设置的一部分。这也是由于德国的共同决定制度一直表现出适应新发展的卓越能力。在这方面,最近的例子是《劳动委员会现代化法案》和《企业供应链尽职调查法案》。这也意味着,基本上共同决定已被证明是一种稳定而灵活的制度。如今,员工参与似乎是成功管理转型过程的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信