How to prevent nasal obstruction after Rhinoseptoplasty. Could a routine turbinate reduction improve the outcomes in Quality of Life of patients?

B. H. D. Moura
{"title":"How to prevent nasal obstruction after Rhinoseptoplasty. Could a routine turbinate reduction improve the outcomes in Quality of Life of patients?","authors":"B. H. D. Moura","doi":"10.33552/ojor.2019.01.000525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rhinoplasty is often performed to restore nasal function and form. The development or maintenance of nasal obstruction after rhinoplasty is a complication that negatively affects quality of life (QOL), and priority should be given to prevention strategies [1]. However, the available surgical techniques to prevent this obstruction have been empirically developed and are often used based on the surgeon’s preference rather than on objective criteria. Currently, strategies like spreaders grafts, support grafts, reconstruction or repositioning cartilages and even a good septoplasty are used to enlarge the nasal valve [2-6]. Another technique widely used is the Reduction of the inferior turbinate [3,7-9]. Otherwise, an established technique to reduce turbinate with hypertrophy is still debatable [10-13]. Reviews pointed that research in this field appears to be driven by technological advancement rather than by establishment of patientsʹ benefit. Partly, because of the lack of properly conducted randomized controlled trial with long term results. Some articles even question the efficacy of this procedure in cases of nasal obstruction explained for other reasons rather than turbinate hypertrophy isolated [14]. A Recent clinical trial reveal that the association of turbinectomy with septoplasty, though widespread, does not improve the nasal obstruction clinical outcomes and can add risks to patients [15].","PeriodicalId":365490,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/ojor.2019.01.000525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rhinoplasty is often performed to restore nasal function and form. The development or maintenance of nasal obstruction after rhinoplasty is a complication that negatively affects quality of life (QOL), and priority should be given to prevention strategies [1]. However, the available surgical techniques to prevent this obstruction have been empirically developed and are often used based on the surgeon’s preference rather than on objective criteria. Currently, strategies like spreaders grafts, support grafts, reconstruction or repositioning cartilages and even a good septoplasty are used to enlarge the nasal valve [2-6]. Another technique widely used is the Reduction of the inferior turbinate [3,7-9]. Otherwise, an established technique to reduce turbinate with hypertrophy is still debatable [10-13]. Reviews pointed that research in this field appears to be driven by technological advancement rather than by establishment of patientsʹ benefit. Partly, because of the lack of properly conducted randomized controlled trial with long term results. Some articles even question the efficacy of this procedure in cases of nasal obstruction explained for other reasons rather than turbinate hypertrophy isolated [14]. A Recent clinical trial reveal that the association of turbinectomy with septoplasty, though widespread, does not improve the nasal obstruction clinical outcomes and can add risks to patients [15].
鼻中隔成形术后如何预防鼻塞。常规鼻甲复位能改善患者的生活质量吗?
鼻整形术通常用于恢复鼻功能和形状。鼻成形术后鼻塞的发生或维持是影响生活质量(QOL)的并发症,应优先考虑预防策略[1]。然而,可用的手术技术,以防止这种阻塞已经经验发展,并经常使用基于外科医生的偏好,而不是客观标准。目前,扩大鼻瓣的策略包括扩张片移植物、支撑移植物、软骨重建或重新定位,甚至采用良好的鼻中隔成形术[2-6]。另一种广泛使用的技术是下鼻甲复位[3,7-9]。否则,一种既有的技术来减少肥大的鼻甲仍然是有争议的[10-13]。综述指出,该领域的研究似乎是由技术进步驱动的,而不是由建立患者利益驱动的。部分原因是缺乏正确进行的具有长期结果的随机对照试验。一些文章甚至质疑这种方法在其他原因导致鼻甲肥大而非孤立鼻甲肥大的鼻塞病例中的有效性[14]。最近的一项临床试验显示,鼻甲切除术与鼻中隔成形术的相关性虽然广泛存在,但并不能改善鼻塞的临床结果,反而会增加患者的风险[15]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信