A comparison study between WSDMDA and NDT methodologies using Quality Evaluation Framework

M. A. O. Mukhtar, Mohd Fadzil bin Hassan, Jafreezal Bin Jaafar, Lukman bin AB Rahim
{"title":"A comparison study between WSDMDA and NDT methodologies using Quality Evaluation Framework","authors":"M. A. O. Mukhtar, Mohd Fadzil bin Hassan, Jafreezal Bin Jaafar, Lukman bin AB Rahim","doi":"10.1109/ICCOINS.2016.7783268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of appropriate Model-Driven Web Engineering (MDWE) methodology as a tool to develop web applications has become an important issue in terms of features that need to be included in the web site. Quality Evaluation Framework (QuEF) is used specifically to evaluate MDWE methodologies and other methodologies in general. It can be used to evaluate either a well-established methodology or a new methodology in early stages of development. In this paper, by using QuEF, NDT as a well-established MDWE methodology has been compared with WSDMDA as a new methodology. The comparison has been conducted based on only Functionality quality characteristic of QuEF and three features namely Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), Web Modeling and Tool Support. Results show that WSDMDA is obtained a higher value for Web Modeling feature, while a higher value for other two features has been obtained by NDT methodology.","PeriodicalId":224429,"journal":{"name":"2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCOINS.2016.7783268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of appropriate Model-Driven Web Engineering (MDWE) methodology as a tool to develop web applications has become an important issue in terms of features that need to be included in the web site. Quality Evaluation Framework (QuEF) is used specifically to evaluate MDWE methodologies and other methodologies in general. It can be used to evaluate either a well-established methodology or a new methodology in early stages of development. In this paper, by using QuEF, NDT as a well-established MDWE methodology has been compared with WSDMDA as a new methodology. The comparison has been conducted based on only Functionality quality characteristic of QuEF and three features namely Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), Web Modeling and Tool Support. Results show that WSDMDA is obtained a higher value for Web Modeling feature, while a higher value for other two features has been obtained by NDT methodology.
使用质量评估框架的WSDMDA和NDT方法的比较研究
选择合适的模型驱动Web工程(MDWE)方法作为开发Web应用程序的工具,已经成为需要包含在Web站点中的功能方面的一个重要问题。质量评价框架(QuEF)专门用于评价MDWE方法和其他一般方法。它既可以用来评估一个已建立的方法,也可以用来评估一个处于开发早期阶段的新方法。在本文中,通过使用QuEF,将NDT作为一种完善的MDWE方法与WSDMDA作为一种新方法进行了比较。仅从QuEF的功能质量特征和模型驱动工程(MDE)、Web建模和工具支持三个特征进行比较。结果表明,WSDMDA对Web建模特性获得了较高的值,而NDT方法对其他两个特性获得了较高的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书