Bank Earnings Smoothing, Audit Quality and Procyclicality in Africa: The Case of Loan Loss Provisions

Peterson K. Ozili
{"title":"Bank Earnings Smoothing, Audit Quality and Procyclicality in Africa: The Case of Loan Loss Provisions","authors":"Peterson K. Ozili","doi":"10.1108/RAF-12-2015-0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine whether the way African banks use loan loss provisions (LLP) to smooth earnings is influenced by capital market motivations and the type of auditor, after controlling for non-discretionary determinants of provisions and fluctuations in the business cycle. Design/methodology/approach - To test the income smoothing hypothesis, the model was estimated using panel least square with White’s robust standard error correction, as well as, with and without period fixed effect. Findings - The findings support the income smoothing hypothesis and indicate that African banks use LLP to smooth earnings; listed African banks use LLP to smooth earnings to a greater extent compared to non-listed African banks, possibly, for capital market reasons; income smoothing via LLP is not reduced among African banks with Big 4 auditors; and after controlling for macroeconomic fluctuation, there is evidence that bank provisioning is procyclical with fluctuations in the business cycle. Research limitations/implications - The findings have three implications. One, listed African banks smooth income because they are more visible to investors; investors do not view stock price fluctuations as a good signal. Securities market regulators in African countries should enforce strict disclosure rules that reduce earnings smoothing practices to improve the transparency of bank earnings in the region. Two, the presence of a Big 4 auditor did not improve the informativeness of LLP estimates among African banks. Three, the evidence for procyclical provisioning suggest the need for dynamic LLP system in Africa. Originality/value - This paper is the first cross-country African study to investigate whether provisions-based income smoothing decreases with the presence of a Big 4 auditor. The findings indicate that this is not the case among African banks.","PeriodicalId":202880,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods & Methodology in Accounting eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods & Methodology in Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-12-2015-0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine whether the way African banks use loan loss provisions (LLP) to smooth earnings is influenced by capital market motivations and the type of auditor, after controlling for non-discretionary determinants of provisions and fluctuations in the business cycle. Design/methodology/approach - To test the income smoothing hypothesis, the model was estimated using panel least square with White’s robust standard error correction, as well as, with and without period fixed effect. Findings - The findings support the income smoothing hypothesis and indicate that African banks use LLP to smooth earnings; listed African banks use LLP to smooth earnings to a greater extent compared to non-listed African banks, possibly, for capital market reasons; income smoothing via LLP is not reduced among African banks with Big 4 auditors; and after controlling for macroeconomic fluctuation, there is evidence that bank provisioning is procyclical with fluctuations in the business cycle. Research limitations/implications - The findings have three implications. One, listed African banks smooth income because they are more visible to investors; investors do not view stock price fluctuations as a good signal. Securities market regulators in African countries should enforce strict disclosure rules that reduce earnings smoothing practices to improve the transparency of bank earnings in the region. Two, the presence of a Big 4 auditor did not improve the informativeness of LLP estimates among African banks. Three, the evidence for procyclical provisioning suggest the need for dynamic LLP system in Africa. Originality/value - This paper is the first cross-country African study to investigate whether provisions-based income smoothing decreases with the presence of a Big 4 auditor. The findings indicate that this is not the case among African banks.
非洲银行盈余平滑、审计质量和顺周期性:以贷款损失准备为例
目的-本文的目的是实证检验非洲银行使用贷款损失准备金(LLP)来平滑盈利的方式是否受到资本市场动机和审计师类型的影响,在控制了准备金和商业周期波动的非酌情决定因素之后。设计/方法/方法-为了检验收入平滑假设,模型使用带有怀特稳健标准误差修正的面板最小二乘法进行估计,以及有无周期固定效应。研究结果-研究结果支持收入平滑假设,并表明非洲银行使用LLP平滑收益;与非上市的非洲银行相比,上市的非洲银行使用LLP在更大程度上平滑收益,可能是出于资本市场的原因;在拥有四大会计师事务所的非洲银行中,通过LLP进行的收入平滑并未减少;在控制宏观经济波动后,有证据表明,银行拨备随商业周期的波动呈顺周期变化。研究局限性/启示-研究结果有三个启示。首先,上市的非洲银行收入平稳,因为投资者更容易看到它们;投资者不认为股价波动是一个好信号。非洲国家的证券市场监管机构应执行严格的披露规则,减少收益平滑做法,以提高该地区银行收益的透明度。第二,四大会计师事务所的存在并没有提高非洲银行LLP估计的信息量。第三,顺周期供给的证据表明非洲需要动态的LLP系统。原创性/价值——本文是第一个跨非洲国家的研究,旨在调查基于准备金的收入平滑是否会随着四大会计师事务所的存在而下降。研究结果表明,非洲银行的情况并非如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信