Improving Students’ Achievement in Writing Descriptive Paragraph through Teaching Prewriting Stages

Puji Hariati
{"title":"Improving Students’ Achievement in Writing Descriptive Paragraph through Teaching Prewriting Stages","authors":"Puji Hariati","doi":"10.33258/birle.v3i3.1172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was aimed to find out whether or not Teaching Prewriting Stages can improve students’ ability in writing descriptive paragraphs, to describe the role of prewriting stages in helping the students to write descriptive paragraphs. This study was conducted by using Classroom Action Research. It was done through 1) planning, 2) action, 3) observation, and 4) reflection. The population and the sample was the ninth grade students of SMP Swasta BUDISATRYA at 2018/2019 academic year. This research applied quantitative and qualitative method. Quantitative data were taken from the students' writing descriptive paragraph test. Qualitative data were taken from observation, interview, and diary notes. The result of the research shows that there was some improvement of students’ ability in writing descriptive paragraphs through teaching prewriting stages. It can be proved from the students' score which improved from cycle 1 to cycle 2.  The improvement can be seen that in pre test the means score was 33.52. In the first cycle, meeting 1 the means score was 37.35, in meeting 2 was 42.64 and in meeting 3 was 52.64. In the second cycle, meeting 1 the means score was 64,41,  in meeting 2 was 80 and in meeting 3 was 91.17. The improvement also can be seen from the percentage of the students’ achievement in writing descriptive paragraph by using prewriting stage; in pre test, no one of the students got 75 points. In the first cycle, in meeting 1, and meeting 2, there was also no one student got 75 point,  but in meeting 3 there was 23,52% (8 students) got 75 points. It means there was an improvement about 23.52 % . In the second cycle, in meeting 1 there was 29.41% (10 students) got 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 5.89%. In meeting 2 there was 79.41% (27 students) got 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 50%.  In meeting 3 there was 100% (34 students) got up 75 points. It means that prewriting stages helped the students to write descriptive paragraphs through brainstorming, listing supporting point, making a simple outline to write event, place or object related to the topic. So, the students’ achievement in writing descriptive paragraph is significantly improved by applying prewriting stage.","PeriodicalId":358928,"journal":{"name":"Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i3.1172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was aimed to find out whether or not Teaching Prewriting Stages can improve students’ ability in writing descriptive paragraphs, to describe the role of prewriting stages in helping the students to write descriptive paragraphs. This study was conducted by using Classroom Action Research. It was done through 1) planning, 2) action, 3) observation, and 4) reflection. The population and the sample was the ninth grade students of SMP Swasta BUDISATRYA at 2018/2019 academic year. This research applied quantitative and qualitative method. Quantitative data were taken from the students' writing descriptive paragraph test. Qualitative data were taken from observation, interview, and diary notes. The result of the research shows that there was some improvement of students’ ability in writing descriptive paragraphs through teaching prewriting stages. It can be proved from the students' score which improved from cycle 1 to cycle 2.  The improvement can be seen that in pre test the means score was 33.52. In the first cycle, meeting 1 the means score was 37.35, in meeting 2 was 42.64 and in meeting 3 was 52.64. In the second cycle, meeting 1 the means score was 64,41,  in meeting 2 was 80 and in meeting 3 was 91.17. The improvement also can be seen from the percentage of the students’ achievement in writing descriptive paragraph by using prewriting stage; in pre test, no one of the students got 75 points. In the first cycle, in meeting 1, and meeting 2, there was also no one student got 75 point,  but in meeting 3 there was 23,52% (8 students) got 75 points. It means there was an improvement about 23.52 % . In the second cycle, in meeting 1 there was 29.41% (10 students) got 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 5.89%. In meeting 2 there was 79.41% (27 students) got 75 points, it means that there was an improvement about 50%.  In meeting 3 there was 100% (34 students) got up 75 points. It means that prewriting stages helped the students to write descriptive paragraphs through brainstorming, listing supporting point, making a simple outline to write event, place or object related to the topic. So, the students’ achievement in writing descriptive paragraph is significantly improved by applying prewriting stage.
通过预写阶段教学提高学生描述性段落写作水平
本研究旨在探讨写作前阶段教学是否能提高学生的描述性段落写作能力,描述写作前阶段在帮助学生写作描述性段落方面的作用。本研究采用课堂行动研究的方法进行。它是通过1)计划、2)行动、3)观察和4)反思完成的。人口和样本为2018/2019学年SMP Swasta BUDISATRYA的九年级学生。本研究采用定量与定性相结合的方法。定量数据取自学生写作描述性段落测试。定性数据来自观察、访谈和日记记录。研究结果表明,通过预写阶段的教学,学生的描述性段落写作能力有一定的提高。从第一轮到第二轮学生的成绩就可以证明这一点。可以看出,在前测中,平均得分为33.52。在第一个周期,会议1的平均得分为37.35,会议2的平均得分为42.64,会议3的平均得分为52.64。在第二个周期中,会议1的平均得分为64,41,会议2的平均得分为80,会议3的平均得分为91.17。从学生使用预写阶段写作描述性段落的成绩百分比也可以看出提高;在预测中,没有一个学生得75分。在第一个循环中,在会议1和会议2中,也没有一个学生得到75分,但在会议3中,有23人,52%(8人)得到75分。这意味着有23.52%的改善。在第二个循环中,meeting 1中有29.41%(10人)得到75分,即提高了5.89%左右。在会议2中,79.41%(27人)得到75分,这意味着提高了约50%。在第三次会议上,有100%(34名)的学生得到了75分。这意味着写作前阶段帮助学生通过头脑风暴,列出支撑点,做一个简单的大纲来写与主题相关的事件,地点或物体来写描述性段落。因此,运用预写阶段,学生的描述性段落写作成绩明显提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信