Social Consequence of Inter-caste Marriage: A Case Study of Itahari, Sunsari

T. Poudel
{"title":"Social Consequence of Inter-caste Marriage: A Case Study of Itahari, Sunsari","authors":"T. Poudel","doi":"10.3126/dristikon.v13i1.56098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marriage is typically understood to be a sexual and financial relationship that is socially accepted, considered to be more or less permanent, and that implies rights and obligations for the married couple and any children they may have. The Eastern Development Region's urban area serves as the basis for this study. For this study, a total of 30 couples were purposefully chosen as respondents. Eight couples were asked to participate in a thorough study using the case study technique in order to obtain qualitative information about inter-caste marriage and its effects on the personal, professional, and social lives of couples. My research has demonstrated that non-Dalit families are more likely to accept a son-in-law than a daughter-in-law. Because of the family's weak familial network, exposure to the outside world, and the presence of power and status in a very important family, which could overshadow the violation of societal standards? Non-Dalit women who were not able to visit their birth homes on special events like Teej, Bhaitika, and Dasahin felt a loss of kinship relationship because hypogamous marriages are not approved by the natal family.","PeriodicalId":392018,"journal":{"name":"Dristikon: A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dristikon: A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/dristikon.v13i1.56098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marriage is typically understood to be a sexual and financial relationship that is socially accepted, considered to be more or less permanent, and that implies rights and obligations for the married couple and any children they may have. The Eastern Development Region's urban area serves as the basis for this study. For this study, a total of 30 couples were purposefully chosen as respondents. Eight couples were asked to participate in a thorough study using the case study technique in order to obtain qualitative information about inter-caste marriage and its effects on the personal, professional, and social lives of couples. My research has demonstrated that non-Dalit families are more likely to accept a son-in-law than a daughter-in-law. Because of the family's weak familial network, exposure to the outside world, and the presence of power and status in a very important family, which could overshadow the violation of societal standards? Non-Dalit women who were not able to visit their birth homes on special events like Teej, Bhaitika, and Dasahin felt a loss of kinship relationship because hypogamous marriages are not approved by the natal family.
跨种姓婚姻的社会后果:以Sunsari Itahari为例
婚姻通常被理解为一种被社会接受的性和经济关系,被认为或多或少是永久的,这意味着已婚夫妇和他们可能拥有的任何孩子的权利和义务。本研究以东部发展区市区为基础。在这项研究中,有目的地选择了30对夫妇作为调查对象。为了获得关于跨种姓婚姻及其对夫妻个人、职业和社会生活的影响的定性信息,八对夫妇被要求使用案例研究技术参与一项彻底的研究。我的研究表明,非达利特家庭更容易接受女婿,而不是儿媳。因为这个家庭的薄弱的家庭网络,与外界的接触,以及在一个非常重要的家庭中存在的权力和地位,这可能会掩盖违反社会标准的行为?在Teej、Bhaitika和Dasahin等特殊节日,非达利特妇女无法回到自己的生身之家,她们感到失去了亲属关系,因为次婚制婚姻不被生身之家认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信