On the Correlation between the “Electronic Justice” and “Electronic Proceedings” Categories within the Framework of Jurimetrics

Abstract

The article is devoted to the disclosure of the essence of electronic justice and judicial informatization, as well as the distinction between the categories of «electronic justice» and «electronic proceedings». The relevance of the research topic is evidenced by the fact that a variety of digital innovations are increasingly actively integrating into legal reality, penetrating into law enforcement practice, including in the field of the administration of justice, clothed in one or another normatively fixed procedural form. In order to form a comprehensive understanding of e-justice and e-justice, general scientific and private law (historical-legal, formal-legal, comparative-legal) methods are used. It is noted that recently, when revealing the inherent nature of e-justice in the framework of law, the attention of analysts has gradually shifted from the technological side of the issue in favor of the fact that biological intelligence in the implementation of justice can be quite successfully combined with artificial. It is argued that e-justice is nothing more than a set of generally binding legal directives allowing judicial institutions and participants in proceedings to implement their procedural actions in a digital paradigm. It is proved that judicial informatization is the essence of automated technical and managerial programming techniques that focus exclusively on subsidiary organizational and logistical aspects that accompany the entire course of the administration of justice in its various procedural forms and do not replace it.