Miniincisionl versus Median Sternotomy to the Cardiac Myxoma: A Comparison of Outcomes

Kasem Ehab Mohamed, Eldib Osama Saber
{"title":"Miniincisionl versus Median Sternotomy to the Cardiac Myxoma: A Comparison of Outcomes","authors":"Kasem Ehab Mohamed, Eldib Osama Saber","doi":"10.36959/582/444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiac myxoma are the commonest benign cardiac tumor, its pathological character make it higher tendency for showering and embolic complications. Surgery done on urgent base to avoid its complications. Its location in atria make it safely and feasible to minimal invasive approaches. Methods: This is retrospective study analysing data of 68 patients operated in zagazig university hospital and Naser institutes from July 2011 to December 2020. 49 patients operated through standard median sternotomy while 19 patients through mini incisions (right anterior mini thoracotomy and partial lower sternotomy). Results: Demographic data of patients in both groups are non significant , while by pass time and aortic cross clamp is significantly higher in minimal approaches than standard and Tumor size was significantly bigger in standard median sternotomy group. Variables in post operative groups regarding ICU stay and hospital stay are significantly shorter in minimal approaches. Conclusions: Mini incisions are safe and feasible in cardiac myxoma resection with comparable outcome to standard approach .its advantages in less post operative pain, less stay in hospital and less infection and better osmosis are predicators for encouraging to practicing these approaches.","PeriodicalId":143338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Therapeutics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/582/444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac myxoma are the commonest benign cardiac tumor, its pathological character make it higher tendency for showering and embolic complications. Surgery done on urgent base to avoid its complications. Its location in atria make it safely and feasible to minimal invasive approaches. Methods: This is retrospective study analysing data of 68 patients operated in zagazig university hospital and Naser institutes from July 2011 to December 2020. 49 patients operated through standard median sternotomy while 19 patients through mini incisions (right anterior mini thoracotomy and partial lower sternotomy). Results: Demographic data of patients in both groups are non significant , while by pass time and aortic cross clamp is significantly higher in minimal approaches than standard and Tumor size was significantly bigger in standard median sternotomy group. Variables in post operative groups regarding ICU stay and hospital stay are significantly shorter in minimal approaches. Conclusions: Mini incisions are safe and feasible in cardiac myxoma resection with comparable outcome to standard approach .its advantages in less post operative pain, less stay in hospital and less infection and better osmosis are predicators for encouraging to practicing these approaches.
胸骨切开微创与正中切口治疗心脏黏液瘤的疗效比较
背景:心脏黏液瘤是最常见的心脏良性肿瘤,其病理特点使其易发生淋病和栓塞并发症。在紧急情况下进行手术以避免并发症。其在心房的位置使得微创入路是安全可行的。方法:回顾性分析2011年7月至2020年12月在扎加齐格大学附属医院和纳塞尔研究所进行手术治疗的68例患者的资料。49例采用标准胸骨正中切口,19例采用小切口(右前胸骨小切口和部分胸骨下切口)。结果:两组患者的人口学资料均无统计学意义,而最小入路的通过时间和主动脉交叉夹钳明显高于标准入路,标准胸骨正中切口组肿瘤大小明显大于标准入路组。术后组关于ICU住院时间和住院时间的变量在最小入路中显著缩短。结论:小切口在心脏黏液瘤切除术中是安全可行的,其疗效与标准入路相当,其术后疼痛少、住院时间短、感染少、渗透性好等优点值得推广应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信