Safety Effectiveness of Centerline Plus Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Roads

B. Persaud, C. Lyon, K. Eccles, J. Soika
{"title":"Safety Effectiveness of Centerline Plus Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Roads","authors":"B. Persaud, C. Lyon, K. Eccles, J. Soika","doi":"10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The combined application of centerline and shoulder rumble strips is intended to reduce the frequency of crashes by alerting drivers that they are about to leave the traveled lane. To date, this combination treatment has not been rigorously evaluated with a multistate database. To fill this void, this study evaluated treated two-lane rural road locations in three states. To account for potential site selection bias, an empirical Bayes (EB) before-after analysis was conducted. The combined results for all states indicate statistically significant crash reductions for all crash types analyzed. The crash type with the smallest crash modification factor (CMF) (i.e., the greatest crash reduction) is head-on with a CMF of 0.632 (i.e., a crash reduction of 36.8%). For run-off-road, head-on, and sideswipe-opposite direction crashes combined (i.e., lane departure crashes), the estimated CMF is 0.733. Benefit:cost (B:C) ratios were estimated to range from 28.2 to 67.7, depending on the treatment cost and service life assumption. Language: en","PeriodicalId":305908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Engineering-asce","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Engineering-asce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The combined application of centerline and shoulder rumble strips is intended to reduce the frequency of crashes by alerting drivers that they are about to leave the traveled lane. To date, this combination treatment has not been rigorously evaluated with a multistate database. To fill this void, this study evaluated treated two-lane rural road locations in three states. To account for potential site selection bias, an empirical Bayes (EB) before-after analysis was conducted. The combined results for all states indicate statistically significant crash reductions for all crash types analyzed. The crash type with the smallest crash modification factor (CMF) (i.e., the greatest crash reduction) is head-on with a CMF of 0.632 (i.e., a crash reduction of 36.8%). For run-off-road, head-on, and sideswipe-opposite direction crashes combined (i.e., lane departure crashes), the estimated CMF is 0.733. Benefit:cost (B:C) ratios were estimated to range from 28.2 to 67.7, depending on the treatment cost and service life assumption. Language: en
双车道乡村公路中心线加肩带的安全效果
中心线和肩带的联合应用旨在通过提醒司机他们即将离开行驶车道来减少撞车的频率。迄今为止,这种联合治疗还没有经过多状态数据库的严格评估。为了填补这一空白,本研究评估了三个州处理过的双车道农村道路位置。为了解释潜在的选址偏差,进行了经验贝叶斯(EB)前后分析。所有州的综合结果表明,在所分析的所有碰撞类型中,统计上显著的碰撞减少。碰撞修正因子(CMF)最小(即最大的碰撞减少)的碰撞类型是正面的,其CMF为0.632(即碰撞减少36.8%)。对于越野跑、正面碰撞和侧擦反方向碰撞(即车道偏离碰撞),估计的CMF为0.733。效益:成本(B:C)比率估计在28.2到67.7之间,这取决于治疗成本和使用寿命假设。语言:在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信