{"title":"Enhancing University Persistence of Diverse Mechanical Engineering Students","authors":"J. Fertig, S. Kumpaty","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-70862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper is the third in a series of efforts to address the troublesome departure of promising college students, most notably women and minorities, from the field of mechanical engineering and similar disciplines. Despite widespread and largely successful efforts to increase the numbers of women and minorities in engineering education, their numbers continue to shrink at a time when they should be expanding. Our first inquiry (IMECE 2017-72597) proposed a mismatch between the empathizing tendency of many students and a climate that discourages professional outlets for such tendencies; as well as incongruencies between professional and engineering identities. We argued that female students were deterred from their engineering aspirations by a climate that included engineering stereotypes, a traditional male-style hierarchy, and differential treatment. Our second endeavor (IMECE 2020-23679) showcased findings from a subsequent STEMpathy study we conducted at our own institution that inspired a persistence model that placed social responsibility goals, or the desire to pursue a career for the betterment of humanity, as well as treatment of students, front and center in the effort to better understand female and minority persistence. Surrounding that goal orientation are categories of factors that deter women and minorities that can be categorized as: 1) Cultural ideological forces; 2) Social structural factors; and 3) the Organizational culture of mechanical engineering. The current undertaking advances empirically based recommendations on ways to: 1) foster a more inclusive engineering culture; 2) enhance the curriculum; and 3) improve public perception of mechanical engineering with the aim of boosting students’ desire to embrace and persist in mechanical engineering. Persistence data from our study informs a five-year NSF grant: S-STEM: The Mechanical Engineering Retention, Academic Success and Career Pathway Program (NSF: DUE-2027632).","PeriodicalId":187039,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Engineering Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-70862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper is the third in a series of efforts to address the troublesome departure of promising college students, most notably women and minorities, from the field of mechanical engineering and similar disciplines. Despite widespread and largely successful efforts to increase the numbers of women and minorities in engineering education, their numbers continue to shrink at a time when they should be expanding. Our first inquiry (IMECE 2017-72597) proposed a mismatch between the empathizing tendency of many students and a climate that discourages professional outlets for such tendencies; as well as incongruencies between professional and engineering identities. We argued that female students were deterred from their engineering aspirations by a climate that included engineering stereotypes, a traditional male-style hierarchy, and differential treatment. Our second endeavor (IMECE 2020-23679) showcased findings from a subsequent STEMpathy study we conducted at our own institution that inspired a persistence model that placed social responsibility goals, or the desire to pursue a career for the betterment of humanity, as well as treatment of students, front and center in the effort to better understand female and minority persistence. Surrounding that goal orientation are categories of factors that deter women and minorities that can be categorized as: 1) Cultural ideological forces; 2) Social structural factors; and 3) the Organizational culture of mechanical engineering. The current undertaking advances empirically based recommendations on ways to: 1) foster a more inclusive engineering culture; 2) enhance the curriculum; and 3) improve public perception of mechanical engineering with the aim of boosting students’ desire to embrace and persist in mechanical engineering. Persistence data from our study informs a five-year NSF grant: S-STEM: The Mechanical Engineering Retention, Academic Success and Career Pathway Program (NSF: DUE-2027632).
这篇论文是一系列努力中的第三篇,旨在解决有前途的大学生(尤其是女性和少数族裔)离开机械工程和类似学科领域的问题。尽管在增加女性和少数族裔在工程教育中的人数方面做出了广泛而成功的努力,但在他们应该扩大的时候,他们的人数却在继续减少。我们的第一项调查(IMECE 2017-72597)提出了许多学生的共情倾向与阻碍这种倾向的专业渠道的氛围之间的不匹配;以及专业和工程身份之间的不一致。我们认为,女学生被包括工程刻板印象、传统男性风格的等级制度和差别待遇在内的环境所阻碍。我们的第二次尝试(IMECE 2020-23679)展示了我们在自己的机构进行的后续STEMpathy研究的结果,该研究启发了一种坚持模式,将社会责任目标,或追求改善人类的职业的愿望,以及学生的待遇,放在首位和中心,以更好地理解女性和少数民族的坚持。围绕这一目标取向的是阻碍妇女和少数民族的各种因素,它们可以被分类为:1)文化意识形态力量;2)社会结构因素;3)机械工程的组织文化。目前的工作提出了基于经验的建议:1)培养更具包容性的工程文化;2)加强课程设置;3)提高公众对机械工程的认知,增强学生对机械工程的热爱和坚持。我们研究的持久性数据为一项为期五年的NSF资助提供了依据:S-STEM:机械工程保留、学术成功和职业路径计划(NSF: du -2027632)。