NGOs and the Legitimacy of International Development

S. Smyth
{"title":"NGOs and the Legitimacy of International Development","authors":"S. Smyth","doi":"10.17161/1808.20250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The influence of NGOs in international development policy and practice has grown exponentially since the end of the Cold War. These NGOs’ agendas now compete with donor states’ in setting the priorities for international development assistance. Indeed, many NGOs now claim that the legitimacy of international development institutions depends on their inclusion in institutional governance. Several prominent policymakers have expressed a similar view. This article challenges that position. I maintain that legitimacy is the wrong basis on which to stake out a claim for greater NGO involvement in international development institutions. I show that the legitimacy of an international development institution, like the legitimacy of a government bureaucracy, derives from the legitimacy of the states that created it and depends on its due and efficacious discharge of the mandate such states confer on it. Therefore, if the member states of a development institution mandate that NGOs be included in governance, NGO inclusion is critical to that institution’s legitimacy. Absent such a mandate, however, an international development institution’s legitimacy depends on its carrying out the pre-determined tasks and goals of the states that create it. As international bureaucracies, development institutions’ legitimacy equates with efficacy. NGO participation independent of, and unrelated to efficacy, has no bearing on an international development institution’s legitimacy.Whether NGO participation in governances contributes to a development institution’s efficacy is a matter for empirical research. General principles suggest that NGO participation contributes to a development institution’s credibility both within developing and developed countries. Lessons gleaned from the recent experience of development institutions further support that view. If efficacy depends on credibility and credibility depends on NGO involvement, several conclusions follow; the design of new development institutions should include a space for NGOs, existing institutions that exclude NGOs should change. Paradoxically, NGO participation as a contributor to increased institutional credibility could also contribute to an institution’s legitimacy. How and why we get to that result, however, matters.","PeriodicalId":139640,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Nongovernmental Organizations (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Nongovernmental Organizations (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/1808.20250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The influence of NGOs in international development policy and practice has grown exponentially since the end of the Cold War. These NGOs’ agendas now compete with donor states’ in setting the priorities for international development assistance. Indeed, many NGOs now claim that the legitimacy of international development institutions depends on their inclusion in institutional governance. Several prominent policymakers have expressed a similar view. This article challenges that position. I maintain that legitimacy is the wrong basis on which to stake out a claim for greater NGO involvement in international development institutions. I show that the legitimacy of an international development institution, like the legitimacy of a government bureaucracy, derives from the legitimacy of the states that created it and depends on its due and efficacious discharge of the mandate such states confer on it. Therefore, if the member states of a development institution mandate that NGOs be included in governance, NGO inclusion is critical to that institution’s legitimacy. Absent such a mandate, however, an international development institution’s legitimacy depends on its carrying out the pre-determined tasks and goals of the states that create it. As international bureaucracies, development institutions’ legitimacy equates with efficacy. NGO participation independent of, and unrelated to efficacy, has no bearing on an international development institution’s legitimacy.Whether NGO participation in governances contributes to a development institution’s efficacy is a matter for empirical research. General principles suggest that NGO participation contributes to a development institution’s credibility both within developing and developed countries. Lessons gleaned from the recent experience of development institutions further support that view. If efficacy depends on credibility and credibility depends on NGO involvement, several conclusions follow; the design of new development institutions should include a space for NGOs, existing institutions that exclude NGOs should change. Paradoxically, NGO participation as a contributor to increased institutional credibility could also contribute to an institution’s legitimacy. How and why we get to that result, however, matters.
非政府组织与国际发展的合法性
自冷战结束以来,非政府组织在国际发展政策和实践中的影响力呈指数级增长。这些非政府组织的议程现在与捐助国在确定国际发展援助的优先事项方面展开竞争。事实上,许多非政府组织现在声称,国际发展机构的合法性取决于它们是否被纳入机构治理。几位著名的政策制定者也表达了类似的观点。这篇文章挑战了这一立场。我认为,在合法性的基础上主张非政府组织更多地参与国际发展机构是错误的。我指出,一个国际发展机构的合法性,就像一个政府官僚机构的合法性一样,来自创建它的国家的合法性,并取决于它适当和有效地履行这些国家赋予它的任务。因此,如果一个发展机构的成员国要求非政府组织参与治理,那么非政府组织的参与对该机构的合法性至关重要。然而,如果没有这样的授权,一个国际发展机构的合法性取决于它是否执行创建它的国家预先确定的任务和目标。作为国际官僚机构,发展机构的合法性等同于效力。非政府组织的参与是独立的,与效力无关,与国际发展机构的合法性无关。非政府组织参与治理是否有助于发展机构的效率,这是一个实证研究的问题。一般原则表明,非政府组织的参与有助于提高发展机构在发展中国家和发达国家的信誉。从发展机构最近的经验中吸取的教训进一步支持了这一观点。如果有效性取决于可信度,可信度取决于非政府组织的参与,可以得出以下几个结论:新的发展机构的设计应该包括非政府组织的空间,现有的排斥非政府组织的机构应该改变。矛盾的是,非政府组织作为提高机构信誉的贡献者的参与也可能有助于机构的合法性。然而,我们如何以及为什么会得到这个结果很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信