Theoretical and Methodical Aspects of Crowdsourcing: Effectiveness and Its Measuring. A Conceptual Paper

Regina Lenart-Gansiniec
{"title":"Theoretical and Methodical Aspects of Crowdsourcing: Effectiveness and Its Measuring. A Conceptual Paper","authors":"Regina Lenart-Gansiniec","doi":"10.7341/20171343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our tmes, a growing interest of organizatons, including also the public ones, in crowdsourcing, can be observed. It enables to acquire knowledge located in virtual communites. However, despite many benefts, crowdsourcing initatves very ofen fail. Therefore, a need for their evaluaton is recognized. Nonetheless, in the subject literature, a shortall of criteria and methods of evaluatng crowdsourcing may be observed. The existng proposals do not ensure a comprehensive picture of crowdsourcing, and they do not take into account its multdimensionality. The artcle is intended for a presentaton of the ways of evaluatng crowdsourcing and an original proposal of a list of indicators, which may be used for evaluatng crowdsourcing in public organizatons. The artcle presents the original proposal of actvites, by which it is possible to assess the degree of implementaton of the adopted tasks and determine the level of obtained crowdsourcing results. The conducted research allowed to recognize that it is possible to measure crowdsourcing results using quanttatve and qualitatve indicators. A prerequisite for selectng the appropriate means is frst of all to indicate the purposes for which crowdsourcing should be used.","PeriodicalId":352730,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7341/20171343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In our tmes, a growing interest of organizatons, including also the public ones, in crowdsourcing, can be observed. It enables to acquire knowledge located in virtual communites. However, despite many benefts, crowdsourcing initatves very ofen fail. Therefore, a need for their evaluaton is recognized. Nonetheless, in the subject literature, a shortall of criteria and methods of evaluatng crowdsourcing may be observed. The existng proposals do not ensure a comprehensive picture of crowdsourcing, and they do not take into account its multdimensionality. The artcle is intended for a presentaton of the ways of evaluatng crowdsourcing and an original proposal of a list of indicators, which may be used for evaluatng crowdsourcing in public organizatons. The artcle presents the original proposal of actvites, by which it is possible to assess the degree of implementaton of the adopted tasks and determine the level of obtained crowdsourcing results. The conducted research allowed to recognize that it is possible to measure crowdsourcing results using quanttatve and qualitatve indicators. A prerequisite for selectng the appropriate means is frst of all to indicate the purposes for which crowdsourcing should be used.
众包的理论和方法方面:有效性及其测量。一篇概念性论文
在我们这个时代,我们可以看到越来越多的组织,包括公共组织,对众包的兴趣。它使人们能够获得位于虚拟社区的知识。然而,尽管有很多好处,众包计划经常失败。因此,认识到有必要对其进行评价。尽管如此,在主题文献中,可以观察到评估众包的标准和方法的不足。现有的建议并没有确保对众包的全面了解,也没有考虑到众包的多维性。本文旨在介绍评估众包的方法,并提出一份可用于评估公共组织众包的指标清单的原始建议。本文提出了活动的原始提案,通过该提案可以评估所采用任务的执行程度,并确定获得的众包结果的水平。所进行的研究使人们认识到,可以使用定量和定性指标来衡量众包的结果。选择合适的手段的先决条件是首先要明确使用众包的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信