The effect of Test-Driven Development and Behavior-Driven Development on Project Success Factors: A Systematic Literature Review Based Study

H. Abushama, Hanaa Altigani Alassam, Fatin A. Elhaj
{"title":"The effect of Test-Driven Development and Behavior-Driven Development on Project Success Factors: A Systematic Literature Review Based Study","authors":"H. Abushama, Hanaa Altigani Alassam, Fatin A. Elhaj","doi":"10.1109/ICCCEEE49695.2021.9429593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile testing approaches test-driven development (TDD), behavior-driven development (BDD); have gained popularity since the introduction of agile practices. The concept of using these approaches in software projects is to help projects succeed. The effect of TDD and BDD on Project success factors namely, cost, time, and customer satisfaction/external quality, remains an area of investigation. Therefore, this study investigates the results of previously published articles on the effect of TDD and BDD on project success factors. A systematic literature review has been conducted considering articles published between 1999 up to 2020. Thirty-one studies were selected and analyzed. 74.1% of studies are experiments, 25.8% are case studies. 67.7% of these studies were performed in an industrial setting, 29.0% were performed in an academic setting and only one study with 3.22% was mixed academic and industrial settings. The result shows that the TDD and the BDD consume more time and cost compared to traditional testing (TLD). Moreover, the TDD as TLD may not necessarily satisfy the customer unlike the BDD appears that achieve customer satisfaction. Although, when TDD compared to BDD, TDD consumed more time and lower customer acceptance than the BDD.","PeriodicalId":359802,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Computer, Control, Electrical, and Electronics Engineering (ICCCEEE)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Computer, Control, Electrical, and Electronics Engineering (ICCCEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCEEE49695.2021.9429593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Agile testing approaches test-driven development (TDD), behavior-driven development (BDD); have gained popularity since the introduction of agile practices. The concept of using these approaches in software projects is to help projects succeed. The effect of TDD and BDD on Project success factors namely, cost, time, and customer satisfaction/external quality, remains an area of investigation. Therefore, this study investigates the results of previously published articles on the effect of TDD and BDD on project success factors. A systematic literature review has been conducted considering articles published between 1999 up to 2020. Thirty-one studies were selected and analyzed. 74.1% of studies are experiments, 25.8% are case studies. 67.7% of these studies were performed in an industrial setting, 29.0% were performed in an academic setting and only one study with 3.22% was mixed academic and industrial settings. The result shows that the TDD and the BDD consume more time and cost compared to traditional testing (TLD). Moreover, the TDD as TLD may not necessarily satisfy the customer unlike the BDD appears that achieve customer satisfaction. Although, when TDD compared to BDD, TDD consumed more time and lower customer acceptance than the BDD.
测试驱动开发和行为驱动开发对项目成功因素的影响:基于系统文献综述的研究
敏捷测试方法测试驱动开发(TDD)、行为驱动开发(BDD);自从引入敏捷实践以来,它就越来越受欢迎。在软件项目中使用这些方法的概念是帮助项目成功。TDD和BDD对项目成功因素的影响,即成本、时间和客户满意度/外部质量,仍然是一个研究领域。因此,本研究调查了之前发表的关于TDD和BDD对项目成功因素影响的文章的结果。对1999年至2020年发表的文章进行了系统的文献回顾。选取并分析了31项研究。74.1%的研究是实验,25.8%是案例研究。这些研究中67.7%在工业环境中进行,29.0%在学术环境中进行,只有一项研究(3.22%)是学术和工业混合环境。结果表明,与传统测试(TLD)相比,TDD和BDD消耗了更多的时间和成本。此外,作为TLD的TDD可能不一定满足客户,不像BDD那样实现客户满意度。虽然,当TDD与BDD比较时,TDD比BDD消耗更多的时间和更低的客户接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信