“Us” versus “Them” Ethnic Identity Construction in Nigerian Political Discourse

C. Ezeifeka
{"title":"“Us” versus “Them” Ethnic Identity Construction in Nigerian Political Discourse","authors":"C. Ezeifeka","doi":"10.30845/ijll.v6n3p8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work interrogates observed exclusionist political discourses that tend to assign ethnic identities of “Us”/“Them” to mark Nigerian citizens in linguisticallyand socially-constructed categories. Taking ethnicity as a sociolinguistic variable, the work specifically focuses on identified linguistic strategies and social motivations that arguably explain ethnic identity construction along lines of selective alignments and exclusion. Adopting van Dijk’s ideological square, Ukiwo’s social tendencies of ethnic identity construction and Reisigl and Wodak’s linguistic strategies for sustaining ethnic and racial othering, this paper analyses purposively sampled textual representations from online and print media texts. Qualitative analyses show exaggerated and contrived divisive social constructions for instrumental and spurious gains in the utterances of the political elite and ethnic stakeholders in Nigeria. The paper concludes that national rather than nepotistic considerations should drive the utterances of the power elite and apex ethnic leadership in working out synergistic avenues of harmonious interethnic understanding.","PeriodicalId":409958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v6n3p8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This work interrogates observed exclusionist political discourses that tend to assign ethnic identities of “Us”/“Them” to mark Nigerian citizens in linguisticallyand socially-constructed categories. Taking ethnicity as a sociolinguistic variable, the work specifically focuses on identified linguistic strategies and social motivations that arguably explain ethnic identity construction along lines of selective alignments and exclusion. Adopting van Dijk’s ideological square, Ukiwo’s social tendencies of ethnic identity construction and Reisigl and Wodak’s linguistic strategies for sustaining ethnic and racial othering, this paper analyses purposively sampled textual representations from online and print media texts. Qualitative analyses show exaggerated and contrived divisive social constructions for instrumental and spurious gains in the utterances of the political elite and ethnic stakeholders in Nigeria. The paper concludes that national rather than nepotistic considerations should drive the utterances of the power elite and apex ethnic leadership in working out synergistic avenues of harmonious interethnic understanding.
尼日利亚政治话语中的“我们”与“他们”族群认同建构
这项工作质疑观察到的排他主义政治话语,这些话语倾向于分配“我们”/“他们”的种族身份,以语言和社会建构的类别来标记尼日利亚公民。将种族作为一个社会语言学变量,这项工作特别关注已确定的语言策略和社会动机,这些策略和动机可以解释沿着选择性结盟和排斥路线的种族认同建设。本文采用范戴克的意识形态广场、Ukiwo的族群认同建构的社会倾向以及Reisigl和Wodak维持族群和种族他者的语言策略,有目的地分析了网络和印刷媒体文本的文本表征样本。定性分析表明,尼日利亚政治精英和少数民族利益相关者的言论中存在夸大和人为的分裂社会结构,以获得工具性和虚假的收益。本文的结论是,在构建和谐的民族间理解的协同途径时,国家而非裙带关系的考虑应该驱动权力精英和最高民族领导人的言论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信