Intimations amid Intimidations: Singleness and Transcendence in Wordsworth’s “Ode”

P. Larkin
{"title":"Intimations amid Intimidations: Singleness and Transcendence in Wordsworth’s “Ode”","authors":"P. Larkin","doi":"10.3828/eir.2022.29.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article considers a factor of intimidation underlying the “intimations” of Wordsworth’s “Ode” without belying the intuitions of the poem. The poet’s contrast between childhood illumination and adult alienation produces intimidating forms of resistance and complexity which are also cues towards further poetic exploration. This process centres on the ambivalent ontology of a “field of many one” and a “single field,” at once sites of spiritual deficit and a mysterious reserve of “things” simply remaining what (if not always as) they are. The article distinguishes the “single” from the “singular” with a glance at two postmodern commentators and investigates the perceptual relations of mind and world explored in Merleau-Ponty, J. L. Chrétien and John Milbank. I conclude that Wordsworth’s “Ode” doesn’t provide a solution to the dilemma it raises but re-offers its own fears, hesitations, and recallings to an horizon of faith, one schooled by the promise of gift stubbornly mediated by single things.","PeriodicalId":281500,"journal":{"name":"Essays in Romanticism","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essays in Romanticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/eir.2022.29.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers a factor of intimidation underlying the “intimations” of Wordsworth’s “Ode” without belying the intuitions of the poem. The poet’s contrast between childhood illumination and adult alienation produces intimidating forms of resistance and complexity which are also cues towards further poetic exploration. This process centres on the ambivalent ontology of a “field of many one” and a “single field,” at once sites of spiritual deficit and a mysterious reserve of “things” simply remaining what (if not always as) they are. The article distinguishes the “single” from the “singular” with a glance at two postmodern commentators and investigates the perceptual relations of mind and world explored in Merleau-Ponty, J. L. Chrétien and John Milbank. I conclude that Wordsworth’s “Ode” doesn’t provide a solution to the dilemma it raises but re-offers its own fears, hesitations, and recallings to an horizon of faith, one schooled by the promise of gift stubbornly mediated by single things.
恐吓中的暗示:华兹华斯《颂歌》中的单一性与超越性
本文在不违背华兹华斯《欢乐颂》的直觉的前提下,探讨了潜藏在《欢乐颂》“暗示”之下的恐吓因素。诗人在童年的光明和成年的疏离之间的对比产生了令人生畏的抵抗和复杂性,这也是进一步诗歌探索的线索。这个过程集中在“多人场”和“单一场”的矛盾本体论上,既是精神缺失的场所,又是神秘的“事物”的保留,只是保持它们的本来面目(如果不是一直如此)。本文通过对两位后现代评论家的考察,区分了“单一”和“单一”,并考察了梅洛-庞蒂、J. L. chrimtien和约翰·米尔班克所探索的心灵与世界的感性关系。我的结论是,华兹华斯的《欢乐颂》并没有为它所引发的困境提供一个解决方案,而是将它自己的恐惧、犹豫和回忆重新呈现在信仰的地平线上,一种被礼物的承诺所教育的信仰,这种承诺固执地以单一的事物为媒介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信