{"title":"Intimations amid Intimidations: Singleness and Transcendence in Wordsworth’s “Ode”","authors":"P. Larkin","doi":"10.3828/eir.2022.29.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article considers a factor of intimidation underlying the “intimations” of Wordsworth’s “Ode” without belying the intuitions of the poem. The poet’s contrast between childhood illumination and adult alienation produces intimidating forms of resistance and complexity which are also cues towards further poetic exploration. This process centres on the ambivalent ontology of a “field of many one” and a “single field,” at once sites of spiritual deficit and a mysterious reserve of “things” simply remaining what (if not always as) they are. The article distinguishes the “single” from the “singular” with a glance at two postmodern commentators and investigates the perceptual relations of mind and world explored in Merleau-Ponty, J. L. Chrétien and John Milbank. I conclude that Wordsworth’s “Ode” doesn’t provide a solution to the dilemma it raises but re-offers its own fears, hesitations, and recallings to an horizon of faith, one schooled by the promise of gift stubbornly mediated by single things.","PeriodicalId":281500,"journal":{"name":"Essays in Romanticism","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essays in Romanticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/eir.2022.29.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article considers a factor of intimidation underlying the “intimations” of Wordsworth’s “Ode” without belying the intuitions of the poem. The poet’s contrast between childhood illumination and adult alienation produces intimidating forms of resistance and complexity which are also cues towards further poetic exploration. This process centres on the ambivalent ontology of a “field of many one” and a “single field,” at once sites of spiritual deficit and a mysterious reserve of “things” simply remaining what (if not always as) they are. The article distinguishes the “single” from the “singular” with a glance at two postmodern commentators and investigates the perceptual relations of mind and world explored in Merleau-Ponty, J. L. Chrétien and John Milbank. I conclude that Wordsworth’s “Ode” doesn’t provide a solution to the dilemma it raises but re-offers its own fears, hesitations, and recallings to an horizon of faith, one schooled by the promise of gift stubbornly mediated by single things.
本文在不违背华兹华斯《欢乐颂》的直觉的前提下,探讨了潜藏在《欢乐颂》“暗示”之下的恐吓因素。诗人在童年的光明和成年的疏离之间的对比产生了令人生畏的抵抗和复杂性,这也是进一步诗歌探索的线索。这个过程集中在“多人场”和“单一场”的矛盾本体论上,既是精神缺失的场所,又是神秘的“事物”的保留,只是保持它们的本来面目(如果不是一直如此)。本文通过对两位后现代评论家的考察,区分了“单一”和“单一”,并考察了梅洛-庞蒂、J. L. chrimtien和约翰·米尔班克所探索的心灵与世界的感性关系。我的结论是,华兹华斯的《欢乐颂》并没有为它所引发的困境提供一个解决方案,而是将它自己的恐惧、犹豫和回忆重新呈现在信仰的地平线上,一种被礼物的承诺所教育的信仰,这种承诺固执地以单一的事物为媒介。