Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives

James Harvey-Davitt
{"title":"Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives","authors":"James Harvey-Davitt","doi":"10.5117/NECSUS2014.2.HARV","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his burgeoning body of film theoretical work the French philosopher Jacques Rancière repeatedly turns to some canonical films by Neorealist pioneer Roberto Rossellini. Not simply retreading tired motifs of Neorealism, Rancière’s comments offer some profound new insights, revolutionising prior perspectives on Rossellini. In this article I shall put Rancière’s perspective into dialogue with two of the most significant of these perspectives: André Bazin’s and Gilles Deleuze’s. In doing so I shall claim that Rancière’s approach departs radically from the canonised, standardised Neorealist conception of Rossellini. Instead, I wish to claim that he describes a modernist artist primarily concerned with aesthetic clashes. In doing so I shall contemplate how the meaning of these films has evolved since the era of their contemporary reception, demonstrating the congruence and disparity between these three disparate approaches.","PeriodicalId":174743,"journal":{"name":"Necsus. European Journal of Media Studies","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Necsus. European Journal of Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/NECSUS2014.2.HARV","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In his burgeoning body of film theoretical work the French philosopher Jacques Rancière repeatedly turns to some canonical films by Neorealist pioneer Roberto Rossellini. Not simply retreading tired motifs of Neorealism, Rancière’s comments offer some profound new insights, revolutionising prior perspectives on Rossellini. In this article I shall put Rancière’s perspective into dialogue with two of the most significant of these perspectives: André Bazin’s and Gilles Deleuze’s. In doing so I shall claim that Rancière’s approach departs radically from the canonised, standardised Neorealist conception of Rossellini. Instead, I wish to claim that he describes a modernist artist primarily concerned with aesthetic clashes. In doing so I shall contemplate how the meaning of these films has evolved since the era of their contemporary reception, demonstrating the congruence and disparity between these three disparate approaches.
质疑罗西里尼:三个法国观点
法国哲学家雅克·朗西在其蓬勃发展的电影理论著作中,反复引用新现实主义先驱罗伯托·罗西里尼的一些经典电影。ranci的评论并非简单地重复新现实主义的陈旧主题,而是提供了一些深刻的新见解,彻底改变了之前对罗西里尼的看法。在这篇文章中,我将把朗西的观点与其中两个最重要的观点:安德烈·巴赞和吉尔·德勒兹的观点进行对话。在这样做的过程中,我要声明,朗西的方法从根本上背离了罗西里尼的规范化、标准化的新现实主义概念。相反,我想说,他描述了一个主要关注审美冲突的现代主义艺术家。在这样做的过程中,我将思考这些电影的意义是如何演变的,因为他们的当代接受的时代,展示这三种不同的方法之间的一致性和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信