Retrocessos na política nacional de Saúde Mental: consequências para o paradigma psicossocial

José Guilherme Nogueira Passarinho
{"title":"Retrocessos na política nacional de Saúde Mental: consequências para o paradigma psicossocial","authors":"José Guilherme Nogueira Passarinho","doi":"10.12957/rep.2022.63451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– This theoretical essay discuss the main changes in the Bra- zilian National Mental Health Policy in the period from 2016 to 2020, when the so-called ‘New National Mental Health Policy’ is instituted. In this sense, we endorse the argument of several authors who qualified the new guidelines as regressions in face of the achievements of the Brazilian Psychiatric Reform. In this context, this essay is intended as a justification for the pertinence of terms such as ‘regression’ and ‘counter-reformation’, highlighting above all the ethical and political aspects involved in these characterizations. For that, we did a paradig- matic analysis of the antagonistic ways of producing mental health care, which allowed to demonstrate the tension established by new legislation with the postulates of the Psychiatric Reform and Psychosocial Care","PeriodicalId":269159,"journal":{"name":"Revista Em Pauta","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Em Pauta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/rep.2022.63451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

– This theoretical essay discuss the main changes in the Bra- zilian National Mental Health Policy in the period from 2016 to 2020, when the so-called ‘New National Mental Health Policy’ is instituted. In this sense, we endorse the argument of several authors who qualified the new guidelines as regressions in face of the achievements of the Brazilian Psychiatric Reform. In this context, this essay is intended as a justification for the pertinence of terms such as ‘regression’ and ‘counter-reformation’, highlighting above all the ethical and political aspects involved in these characterizations. For that, we did a paradig- matic analysis of the antagonistic ways of producing mental health care, which allowed to demonstrate the tension established by new legislation with the postulates of the Psychiatric Reform and Psychosocial Care
国家心理健康政策的挫折:对心理社会范式的后果
-这篇理论文章讨论了2016年至2020年期间,所谓的“新的国家精神卫生政策”制定期间,巴西国家精神卫生政策的主要变化。从这个意义上说,我们赞同几位作者的论点,他们认为面对巴西精神病学改革的成就,新指南是倒退。在这种背景下,本文旨在为“回归”和“反改革”等术语的相关性辩护,突出了这些特征所涉及的所有伦理和政治方面。为此,我们对产生精神卫生保健的对立方式进行了范式分析,从而证明了新立法与精神病学改革和社会心理护理的假设所建立的紧张关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信