The Cost of Care if You Don’s Own Your Home

G. Roberts
{"title":"The Cost of Care if You Don’s Own Your Home","authors":"G. Roberts","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv177tgp0.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the complex set of issues when a person does not own their home. It has been acknowledged and debated for a long time that the social care funding system is not fit for purpose, and in its current form is untenable both monetarily and politically. The focus of the funding debate continues to be on those individuals who do own their own home and how they make a valuable contribution to maintaining the current system. There is consideration that this system is unfair on individuals who are deemed to have provided for their future, but little consideration of the implications for individuals who, whether through choice or circumstance, have no assets to use towards the cost of their care. Despite one in four people over the age of 75 not owning their own home, they have been largely ignored as part of the deliberations. Disappointingly, the interpretation of what is fair seems based on what can be contributed in financial terms. Unfairness should also be measured morally and ethically: people who do not own their own home also face an unfair system, one of limited choice and delayed access to care.","PeriodicalId":442386,"journal":{"name":"Local Authorities and the Social Determinants of Health","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Authorities and the Social Determinants of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv177tgp0.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter addresses the complex set of issues when a person does not own their home. It has been acknowledged and debated for a long time that the social care funding system is not fit for purpose, and in its current form is untenable both monetarily and politically. The focus of the funding debate continues to be on those individuals who do own their own home and how they make a valuable contribution to maintaining the current system. There is consideration that this system is unfair on individuals who are deemed to have provided for their future, but little consideration of the implications for individuals who, whether through choice or circumstance, have no assets to use towards the cost of their care. Despite one in four people over the age of 75 not owning their own home, they have been largely ignored as part of the deliberations. Disappointingly, the interpretation of what is fair seems based on what can be contributed in financial terms. Unfairness should also be measured morally and ethically: people who do not own their own home also face an unfair system, one of limited choice and delayed access to care.
如果你没有自己的房子,你的护理成本
本章讨论了当一个人没有自己的房子时的一系列复杂问题。长期以来,人们一直承认和争论社会保健基金制度不适合目的,并且以目前的形式在货币和政治上都是站不住脚的。资金辩论的焦点仍然是那些拥有自己住房的人,以及他们如何为维持现有系统做出宝贵的贡献。有人认为,这一制度对那些被认为为自己的未来提供了保障的个人是不公平的,但很少考虑到对那些无论是出于选择还是环境原因,没有资产可用于支付护理费用的个人的影响。尽管75岁以上人群中有四分之一没有自己的房子,但他们在审议过程中基本上被忽视了。令人失望的是,对什么是公平的解释似乎是基于在财务方面可以做出的贡献。还应该从道德和伦理上衡量不公平:没有自己住房的人也面临着不公平的制度,选择有限,获得护理的机会延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信