Comparison of daylighting in the original and reconstructed housing buildings

M. Balková, T. Szabóová, D. Páleš
{"title":"Comparison of daylighting in the original and reconstructed housing buildings","authors":"M. Balková, T. Szabóová, D. Páleš","doi":"10.15414/meraa.2018.04.02.67-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contribution is aimed at the comparison of daylighting in the original and reconstructed housing buildings. On the basis of the measurements of daylighting we calculated the values of the daylight factor in both stables. The distribution of the measuring points in the stables was different. In the original stable were two rows of measuring points, in the reconstructed stable were four rows of measuring points. The course of lighting at the measuring points was shown in program Excel using graphs. The values of the daylight factor were compared in each row in both stables using Scheffe′s test (ANOVA) and box-plot. The results show that lighting in the reconstructed building has increased significantly. The statistical analysis of the results showed that significant difference is not between the rows in which the illuminance measured (P > 0.05) in spite of assumption the lighting under the skylight will certainly be higher. This is caused especially inappropriately selected measuring points. There are in reconstructed stable significant differences in illuminance between the rows, that were under the skylight and rows that were located near the open side walls (P < 0.05). Daylighting is significantly higher under the skylight (P > 0.05).","PeriodicalId":356304,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics in Education, Research and Applications","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics in Education, Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15414/meraa.2018.04.02.67-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contribution is aimed at the comparison of daylighting in the original and reconstructed housing buildings. On the basis of the measurements of daylighting we calculated the values of the daylight factor in both stables. The distribution of the measuring points in the stables was different. In the original stable were two rows of measuring points, in the reconstructed stable were four rows of measuring points. The course of lighting at the measuring points was shown in program Excel using graphs. The values of the daylight factor were compared in each row in both stables using Scheffe′s test (ANOVA) and box-plot. The results show that lighting in the reconstructed building has increased significantly. The statistical analysis of the results showed that significant difference is not between the rows in which the illuminance measured (P > 0.05) in spite of assumption the lighting under the skylight will certainly be higher. This is caused especially inappropriately selected measuring points. There are in reconstructed stable significant differences in illuminance between the rows, that were under the skylight and rows that were located near the open side walls (P < 0.05). Daylighting is significantly higher under the skylight (P > 0.05).
原始和重建房屋采光比较
贡献的目的是比较原始和重建的住宅建筑的采光。在采光测量的基础上,我们计算了两个马厩的日光系数。各马厩的测点分布不同。原始马厩中有两排测点,重建马厩中有四排测点。在程序Excel中用图形表示测点处的照明过程。使用舍夫检验(ANOVA)和箱形图比较两个表中每行日光因子的值。结果表明,改造后的建筑照明明显增加。统计分析结果表明,尽管假定天窗下的照度一定会更高,但各行间的实测照度没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。这是由于测点选择不当造成的。天窗下排和靠近侧墙的排之间的照度在重建时存在稳定的显著差异(P < 0.05)。天窗下的采光显著增加(P < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信