{"title":"Private warehouse investment strategies in small versus large manufacturing firms","authors":"John E. Spillan, M. A. Mcginnis, J. Kohn","doi":"10.22237/JOTM/1254355380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Historically, warehousing performed the function of long term-storage for raw materials, goods in process, and finished goods. Manufacturers fabricated products for storage in warehouses and then sold from inventory. Many warehouses were required to have inventory levels of 60 to 90 days supply to meet productions needs, customer needs, and avoid stock outs. Warehousing of the past was perceived as an inescapable cost center that functioned as a large stock-keeping unit (Coyle et al, 2003). As a result of global competition warehousing has become an important function in the supply chain for maintaining a competitive advantage in customer service, lead-times, and costs (De Koster, 1998). Warehouses have been redesigned and automated for high speed, high throughput rate, and high productivity in order to shrink processing and inventory carrying costs. With the arrival of just-in-time, strategic alliances, and logistical supply chain philosophies in the 1990s, the role of warehousing changed to faculitate the supply chain's goals of shorter cycle times, lower inventories, lower costs, and better customer service. Warehouses are now less likely to be long term storage facilities. They are more likely to be fast paced facilities with greater attention focused on high levels of stock turnover and meeting customer service objectives. In most cases the product is in the warehouse for only a few days or hours (Nynke et al, 2002). More emphasis is now focused on flow-through warehouses where products remain in the warehouse for a short period of time and then move on to their destination (Nynke et al, 2002). An additional influence on warehouse management is the importance of maximizing financial performance in all areas of the firm. Stock and Lambert (2001) use a Strategic Profit Model which emphasized the importance of logistics/supply chain management to organizational financial performance. They demonstrate the impact of investments in inventory and other assets (including warehouse investment), fixed and variable costs, and cost of goods sold on return on net worth. One choice that can impact the firm's financial performance is whether to use private or for-hire (public or contract) warehousing. In addition to affecting financial performance, Stock and Lambert (2001) discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these two warehousing strategies. This discussion is summarized as follows; private warehouses provide a high level of control, flexibility to design and operate the facility to meet specific product and customer needs, are less costly if utilization is high, may make greater use of specialized human resources, and provide tax benefits. However, private warehouses offer less flexibility to respond to fluctuations in demand and require substantial investment. Public (or for-hire) warehousing conserves capital, provides flexibility in responding to changes in market demand, avoids the risk of obsolescence of private facilities, offers a wide range of specialized services, may provide tax advantages, and may enable a manufacturer to better manage its storage and handling costs. Disadvantages of public (for-hire) warehousing include communication problems, uneven availability of specialized services, and space availability problems during peak demand. A hybrid of the above choices is contract warehousing. Here the firm and provider enter into a long-term agreement to outsource some, or all, of the manufacturer's warehousing requirements. When contract warehousing works well the advantages of both private and public warehousing can be realized. When it does not work well the disadvantages of both may dominate. In a 1990 manuscript (McGinnis, Kohn, and Myers) examined a wide range of topics related to private warehouse investment decisions in large manufacturing firms. The research examined factors affecting private warehouse investment decisions, private warehouse investment strategies, items affecting private warehouse investment strategies, and the warehouse mix. …","PeriodicalId":242296,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/JOTM/1254355380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Historically, warehousing performed the function of long term-storage for raw materials, goods in process, and finished goods. Manufacturers fabricated products for storage in warehouses and then sold from inventory. Many warehouses were required to have inventory levels of 60 to 90 days supply to meet productions needs, customer needs, and avoid stock outs. Warehousing of the past was perceived as an inescapable cost center that functioned as a large stock-keeping unit (Coyle et al, 2003). As a result of global competition warehousing has become an important function in the supply chain for maintaining a competitive advantage in customer service, lead-times, and costs (De Koster, 1998). Warehouses have been redesigned and automated for high speed, high throughput rate, and high productivity in order to shrink processing and inventory carrying costs. With the arrival of just-in-time, strategic alliances, and logistical supply chain philosophies in the 1990s, the role of warehousing changed to faculitate the supply chain's goals of shorter cycle times, lower inventories, lower costs, and better customer service. Warehouses are now less likely to be long term storage facilities. They are more likely to be fast paced facilities with greater attention focused on high levels of stock turnover and meeting customer service objectives. In most cases the product is in the warehouse for only a few days or hours (Nynke et al, 2002). More emphasis is now focused on flow-through warehouses where products remain in the warehouse for a short period of time and then move on to their destination (Nynke et al, 2002). An additional influence on warehouse management is the importance of maximizing financial performance in all areas of the firm. Stock and Lambert (2001) use a Strategic Profit Model which emphasized the importance of logistics/supply chain management to organizational financial performance. They demonstrate the impact of investments in inventory and other assets (including warehouse investment), fixed and variable costs, and cost of goods sold on return on net worth. One choice that can impact the firm's financial performance is whether to use private or for-hire (public or contract) warehousing. In addition to affecting financial performance, Stock and Lambert (2001) discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these two warehousing strategies. This discussion is summarized as follows; private warehouses provide a high level of control, flexibility to design and operate the facility to meet specific product and customer needs, are less costly if utilization is high, may make greater use of specialized human resources, and provide tax benefits. However, private warehouses offer less flexibility to respond to fluctuations in demand and require substantial investment. Public (or for-hire) warehousing conserves capital, provides flexibility in responding to changes in market demand, avoids the risk of obsolescence of private facilities, offers a wide range of specialized services, may provide tax advantages, and may enable a manufacturer to better manage its storage and handling costs. Disadvantages of public (for-hire) warehousing include communication problems, uneven availability of specialized services, and space availability problems during peak demand. A hybrid of the above choices is contract warehousing. Here the firm and provider enter into a long-term agreement to outsource some, or all, of the manufacturer's warehousing requirements. When contract warehousing works well the advantages of both private and public warehousing can be realized. When it does not work well the disadvantages of both may dominate. In a 1990 manuscript (McGinnis, Kohn, and Myers) examined a wide range of topics related to private warehouse investment decisions in large manufacturing firms. The research examined factors affecting private warehouse investment decisions, private warehouse investment strategies, items affecting private warehouse investment strategies, and the warehouse mix. …
从历史上看,仓储的功能是长期储存原材料、在制品和成品。制造商制造产品储存在仓库中,然后从库存中出售。许多仓库需要有60到90天的库存水平,以满足生产需求,客户需求,并避免缺货。过去的仓储被认为是一个不可避免的成本中心,作为一个大型的库存单位(Coyle等人,2003)。由于全球竞争,仓储已成为供应链中保持客户服务、交货时间和成本竞争优势的重要功能(De Koster, 1998)。仓库已经被重新设计和自动化,以实现高速、高吞吐率和高生产率,以减少加工和库存携带成本。随着20世纪90年代准时制、战略联盟和物流供应链理念的到来,仓储的作用发生了变化,以促进供应链的目标,即缩短周期时间、降低库存、降低成本和更好的客户服务。仓库现在不太可能是长期储存设施。它们更有可能是快节奏的设施,更注重高水平的库存周转和满足客户服务目标。在大多数情况下,产品在仓库中只有几天或几个小时(Nynke et al, 2002)。现在更多的重点集中在流动仓库,产品在仓库中停留很短的时间,然后转移到目的地(Nynke等人,2002)。对仓库管理的另一个影响是公司所有领域的财务绩效最大化的重要性。Stock和Lambert(2001)使用战略利润模型,强调物流/供应链管理对组织财务绩效的重要性。它们显示了存货和其他资产投资(包括仓库投资)、固定和可变成本以及销售商品成本对净资产回报率的影响。可以影响公司财务业绩的一个选择是使用私人或租用(公共或合同)仓储。除了影响财务绩效外,Stock和Lambert(2001)还讨论了这两种仓储策略的优缺点。本次讨论总结如下:私人仓库提供了高水平的控制,灵活的设计和操作设施,以满足特定的产品和客户的需要,如果利用率高,成本较低,可以更多地利用专门的人力资源,并提供税收优惠。但是,私人仓库应对需求波动的灵活性较差,需要大量投资。公共(或租用)仓储可以节省资金,灵活应对市场需求的变化,避免私人设施过时的风险,提供广泛的专门服务,可以提供税收优惠,并使制造商能够更好地管理其储存和处理费用。公共(租赁)仓储的缺点包括通信问题、专业服务的不均衡可用性以及高峰需求期间的空间可用性问题。上述选择的混合是合同仓储。在这里,公司和供应商签订了一项长期协议,将部分或全部制造商的仓储需求外包出去。当合同仓储运作良好时,可以实现私人仓储和公共仓储的优势。当它不能很好地工作时,两者的缺点可能占主导地位。在1990年的一份手稿中(McGinnis, Kohn, and Myers)研究了与大型制造企业的私人仓库投资决策相关的广泛主题。本研究考察了影响私人仓库投资决策的因素、私人仓库投资策略、影响私人仓库投资策略的项目以及仓库组合。...