Evaluating the clinical application of PAMD score in the assessment of TRUS-biopsy positive outcomes in patients with PSA 4-10 ng/ml treated in Serbia

M. Radovanović, Aleksa Zubelić, V. Šantrić, B. Milojević, U. Bumbaširević, B. Stankovic
{"title":"Evaluating the clinical application of PAMD score in the assessment of TRUS-biopsy positive outcomes in patients with PSA 4-10 ng/ml treated in Serbia","authors":"M. Radovanović, Aleksa Zubelić, V. Šantrić, B. Milojević, U. Bumbaširević, B. Stankovic","doi":"10.5937/medi55-41565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy) is the \"gold standard\" in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). There is much divided opinion on the need for biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 4 and 10 ng/ml. The positive biopsy outcome (PC) in these patients ranges from 20 to 39%. Low sensitivity and specificity of PSA in predicting positive biopsy outcome results in a large number of unnecessary biopsies and treatments. In order to better select candidates for biopsy, several risk stratification models for PC have been proposed in recent years, among them the PAMD score. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the value of the PAMD score in the assessment of positive biopsy outcomes in our population of patients, as well as to examine individual risk factors for PC in patients with PSA values between 4 and 10 ng/ml treated in Serbia. Material and methods: The study involved 50 patients at the Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, whose PSA value were measured in the range from 4 to 10 ng/ml. In all the patients we measured PSA and %fPSA, and performed DRE, as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate prostate volume (PV) and PI-RADS score. All patients underwent TRUS-guided systemic prostate biopsy. In accordance with the data from literature, PAMD score was determined for all the patients. Results: A PAMD score > 3 showed a high specificity in the prediction of PC, as well as an association with a higher frequency of highgrade PC. A positive finding on DRE, %fPSA< 16, age above 69 years and PI-RADS > 3 showed a statistically significant association with the existence of PC. A high individual predictive value in assessing the presence of PC was confirmed for DRE, %fPSA, PV, and PI-RADS score. Conclusion: The PAMD scoring system may be of importance for better selection of candidates for TRUS-biopsy, in the population of patients with PSA values 4-10 ng/ml.","PeriodicalId":167411,"journal":{"name":"Medicinska istrazivanja","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinska istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/medi55-41565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy) is the "gold standard" in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). There is much divided opinion on the need for biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 4 and 10 ng/ml. The positive biopsy outcome (PC) in these patients ranges from 20 to 39%. Low sensitivity and specificity of PSA in predicting positive biopsy outcome results in a large number of unnecessary biopsies and treatments. In order to better select candidates for biopsy, several risk stratification models for PC have been proposed in recent years, among them the PAMD score. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the value of the PAMD score in the assessment of positive biopsy outcomes in our population of patients, as well as to examine individual risk factors for PC in patients with PSA values between 4 and 10 ng/ml treated in Serbia. Material and methods: The study involved 50 patients at the Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, whose PSA value were measured in the range from 4 to 10 ng/ml. In all the patients we measured PSA and %fPSA, and performed DRE, as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate prostate volume (PV) and PI-RADS score. All patients underwent TRUS-guided systemic prostate biopsy. In accordance with the data from literature, PAMD score was determined for all the patients. Results: A PAMD score > 3 showed a high specificity in the prediction of PC, as well as an association with a higher frequency of highgrade PC. A positive finding on DRE, %fPSA< 16, age above 69 years and PI-RADS > 3 showed a statistically significant association with the existence of PC. A high individual predictive value in assessing the presence of PC was confirmed for DRE, %fPSA, PV, and PI-RADS score. Conclusion: The PAMD scoring system may be of importance for better selection of candidates for TRUS-biopsy, in the population of patients with PSA values 4-10 ng/ml.
评估PAMD评分在塞尔维亚治疗的PSA 4-10 ng/ml患者的trus活检阳性结果评估中的临床应用
导读:经直肠超声引导前列腺活检(TRUS-biopsy)是诊断前列腺癌(PC)的“金标准”。对于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)在4至10 ng/ml之间的患者是否需要活检,存在很大的分歧。这些患者的活检阳性结果(PC)在20 - 39%之间。PSA在预测活检阳性结果方面的低敏感性和特异性导致大量不必要的活检和治疗。为了更好地选择活检的候选人,近年来提出了几种PC的风险分层模型,其中包括PAMD评分。目的:本研究的目的是研究PAMD评分在评估我们的患者人群活检阳性结果中的价值,以及在塞尔维亚治疗的PSA值在4至10 ng/ml之间的患者中检查PC的个体危险因素。材料和方法:研究纳入塞尔维亚大学临床中心泌尿外科诊所的50例患者,测量其PSA值在4至10 ng/ml范围内。在所有患者中,我们测量PSA和%fPSA,并进行DRE和磁共振成像(MRI)评估前列腺体积(PV)和PI-RADS评分。所有患者均行超声引导下的全身性前列腺活检。根据文献资料,对所有患者进行PAMD评分。结果:PAMD评分> 3对PC的预测具有较高的特异性,且与高级别PC的发生频率相关。DRE、%fPSA< 16、年龄大于69岁、PI-RADS > 3的阳性结果与PC的存在有统计学意义。DRE、%fPSA、PV和PI-RADS评分在评估PC存在方面具有较高的个体预测价值。结论:在PSA值为4-10 ng/ml的患者群体中,PAMD评分系统可能对更好地选择trus活检候选人具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信