{"title":"Lianozovo biographical myth in Vladimir Sorokin's novel “Blue Lard”","authors":"Yulia V. Tkachuk, Alexei S. Bokarev","doi":"10.20323/2658-7866-2021-4-10-112-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines one of the key episodes of V. Sorokin's novel “Blue Lard” (1999) from the perspective of the biographical myth. In the novel, some prominent representatives of Soviet uncensored art appear as characters. They are members of the Lianozovo group Evgeny Kropivnitsky, Oskar Rabin, Igor Kholin, Genrikh Sapgir, and Vsevolod Nekrasov. It is argued that the Lianozovian “biographical legend” cultivated in the work is formed on the basis of three equal and interrelated semes: “marginality”, “opposition to official art”, and “claims of aesthetic superiority”. The first seme “highlights” I. Holin's past as a prisoner and O. Rabin's complicated relationship with the law; the second emphasizes the opposition of underground art to any “permitted” forms of literature; the third absolutizes its artistic primacy and avant-garde character. The sources of the myth outlined in the novel are analyzed through the memoirs collected by V. Pivovarov in his album Holin and Sapgir jubilant, metapoetic texts by the Lianozovites featuring the literary life of the era (for example, V. Nekrasov's article “”) and their literary works (poems and paintings). V. Sorokin's myth-making strategy involves, on the one hand, reducing biographical images to a few of their most expressive qualities (which makes them one-dimensional) and, on the other hand, replacing conventional codes with occasional ones or “doubling” them (bringing them to their semantic limit).","PeriodicalId":236873,"journal":{"name":"World of Russian-speaking countries","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of Russian-speaking countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20323/2658-7866-2021-4-10-112-126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article examines one of the key episodes of V. Sorokin's novel “Blue Lard” (1999) from the perspective of the biographical myth. In the novel, some prominent representatives of Soviet uncensored art appear as characters. They are members of the Lianozovo group Evgeny Kropivnitsky, Oskar Rabin, Igor Kholin, Genrikh Sapgir, and Vsevolod Nekrasov. It is argued that the Lianozovian “biographical legend” cultivated in the work is formed on the basis of three equal and interrelated semes: “marginality”, “opposition to official art”, and “claims of aesthetic superiority”. The first seme “highlights” I. Holin's past as a prisoner and O. Rabin's complicated relationship with the law; the second emphasizes the opposition of underground art to any “permitted” forms of literature; the third absolutizes its artistic primacy and avant-garde character. The sources of the myth outlined in the novel are analyzed through the memoirs collected by V. Pivovarov in his album Holin and Sapgir jubilant, metapoetic texts by the Lianozovites featuring the literary life of the era (for example, V. Nekrasov's article “”) and their literary works (poems and paintings). V. Sorokin's myth-making strategy involves, on the one hand, reducing biographical images to a few of their most expressive qualities (which makes them one-dimensional) and, on the other hand, replacing conventional codes with occasional ones or “doubling” them (bringing them to their semantic limit).
本文从传记性神话的角度考察了索罗金小说《蓝猪油》(1999)中的一个关键情节。在小说中,一些苏联未经审查的艺术的杰出代表人物出现了。他们是Lianozovo小组的成员Evgeny Kropivnitsky, Oskar Rabin, Igor Kholin, Genrikh Sapgir和Vsevolod Nekrasov。作者认为,作品中所培养的利亚诺佐维亚式的“传世传奇”是在“边缘性”、“对官方艺术的反对”和“审美优越感的主张”三个平等且相互关联的符号基础上形成的。第一部分“突出”了I. Holin作为囚犯的过去以及O. Rabin与法律的复杂关系;第二种观点强调地下艺术对任何“被允许的”文学形式的反对;第三种是将其艺术至上性和先锋性绝对化。通过V. Pivovarov在他的专辑《Holin and Sapgir兴高采烈》中收集的回忆录,Lianozovites的元诗歌文本(例如V. Nekrasov的文章“”)和他们的文学作品(诗歌和绘画)来分析小说中概述的神话来源。索罗金的神话制作策略包括,一方面,将传记图像减少到一些最具表现力的品质(这使它们成为一维的),另一方面,用偶尔出现的代码取代传统的代码或“加倍”它们(使它们达到语义极限)。