V. Andersen, H. Knuutila, L. Braakhuis, Edin Myrhaug, K. Einarsrud, G. Tranell
{"title":"Co2 Capture for the Silicon Process-Effects of Flue Gas Recirculation","authors":"V. Andersen, H. Knuutila, L. Braakhuis, Edin Myrhaug, K. Einarsrud, G. Tranell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3926089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flue gas recirculation has been proposed as a potential process improvement for the silicon and ferrosilicon process. In this paper, flue gas flows and concentration from a 100 MW silicon production operation has been calculated for 0, 25, 50, 62.5 and 75 % flue gas recirculation. Using these flue gas flows as inputs in a carbon capture model shows that specific reboiler duty can be reduced from 3,55 GJ/mtCO2 to 2,85 GJ/mtCO2 by implementing 75 % flue gas recirculation. Cost estimation of the absorber, heat exchanger and blowers indicate a potential 13,3 M$ (62 %) cost reduction between 0 and 75 % FGR.","PeriodicalId":313725,"journal":{"name":"INFACON XVI 2021: Emissions & Reduced CO2","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INFACON XVI 2021: Emissions & Reduced CO2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3926089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Flue gas recirculation has been proposed as a potential process improvement for the silicon and ferrosilicon process. In this paper, flue gas flows and concentration from a 100 MW silicon production operation has been calculated for 0, 25, 50, 62.5 and 75 % flue gas recirculation. Using these flue gas flows as inputs in a carbon capture model shows that specific reboiler duty can be reduced from 3,55 GJ/mtCO2 to 2,85 GJ/mtCO2 by implementing 75 % flue gas recirculation. Cost estimation of the absorber, heat exchanger and blowers indicate a potential 13,3 M$ (62 %) cost reduction between 0 and 75 % FGR.