Rural and Urban Development: Realities that Influence Diverse Perspectives About the Rural-Urban Divide and Continuum in Developing Countries

Jimmy Chulu
{"title":"Rural and Urban Development: Realities that Influence Diverse Perspectives About the Rural-Urban Divide and Continuum in Developing Countries","authors":"Jimmy Chulu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2698104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years of rural and urban development studies, notably by Akkoyunlu (2013, p.3) and Tacoli (2004, p.6), has shown that both rural and urban areas are interconnected economically, financially, and socially. The strong interplay between rural and urban areas through various drivers has created an interface critical in the formulation of poverty reduction strategies particularly in the context of rural-urban disparities (Akkoyunlu (2013, p.4). It ought to be emphasized that the importance of how rural and urban areas intersect is good for positive development outcomes in both rural and urban settlements. Evidence shows that rural-urban linkages offer opportunities for identifying possibilities that can be leveraged to stimulate rural local economic activities and local innovative productive systems that involve both rural and urban areas but in ways that are not harmful to each other. Overall, this analysis marks a departure from the existing situation where rural and urban spaces are viewed as distinctly different from each other (Tacoli 2004, p.6).It is a considered perspective that rural-urban development strategies should be developed explicitly in order to promote rural development and curb rural-urban drift to cities and towns (Tacoli 2004, p.10). Many writers such as Thirlwall (1994, p.88) have argued that there should be no any distinction between rural and urban areas if there was equal development in the world. This does not suggest that it is a recipe or blue-print for rural and urban development. Ideally, there has been a growing interest in the academic discourse on the linkages between rural and urban development. However, the relationship between urban and rural areas in many developing nations is still perceived from the point of economic dualism, in other words, by the coexistence of urban sector and a rural sector (Akkoyunlu 2013, p.4). Traditionally, agriculture accounts for the bulk of employment in developing nations especially in the rural areas and contributes immensely to the growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), export earnings and poverty reduction in many countries. Given its dominance to the economic growth rate, it will remain a primary source of national economy and means of poverty reduction for many years to come (Tacoli 2004, p.2). It must be recognized that populations around the world are becoming increasingly urbanized. The pace of urbanization in less developed countries between 1950 and 1962 was very slow. According to the World Bank Report (2011, p.6), it is argued that especially sub Saharan Africa (SSA) the trend indicate that in 1960 only an average of 28% of the urban population lived in each country's largest city, but by 1980 this had risen to 36%. Similarly, the number of cities with a population of over half a million increased from a mere 3% in 1960, to 28% in 1980 (World Bank 2011, p.6). However, after this period the rate increased substantially. Most developing countries have noticed a transformation in their societies from rural to urban over the last three to four decades. The larger cities in developing countries have been growing very rapidly, often doubling in size every ten years (Thirlwall 1994, p.78).","PeriodicalId":338013,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2698104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years of rural and urban development studies, notably by Akkoyunlu (2013, p.3) and Tacoli (2004, p.6), has shown that both rural and urban areas are interconnected economically, financially, and socially. The strong interplay between rural and urban areas through various drivers has created an interface critical in the formulation of poverty reduction strategies particularly in the context of rural-urban disparities (Akkoyunlu (2013, p.4). It ought to be emphasized that the importance of how rural and urban areas intersect is good for positive development outcomes in both rural and urban settlements. Evidence shows that rural-urban linkages offer opportunities for identifying possibilities that can be leveraged to stimulate rural local economic activities and local innovative productive systems that involve both rural and urban areas but in ways that are not harmful to each other. Overall, this analysis marks a departure from the existing situation where rural and urban spaces are viewed as distinctly different from each other (Tacoli 2004, p.6).It is a considered perspective that rural-urban development strategies should be developed explicitly in order to promote rural development and curb rural-urban drift to cities and towns (Tacoli 2004, p.10). Many writers such as Thirlwall (1994, p.88) have argued that there should be no any distinction between rural and urban areas if there was equal development in the world. This does not suggest that it is a recipe or blue-print for rural and urban development. Ideally, there has been a growing interest in the academic discourse on the linkages between rural and urban development. However, the relationship between urban and rural areas in many developing nations is still perceived from the point of economic dualism, in other words, by the coexistence of urban sector and a rural sector (Akkoyunlu 2013, p.4). Traditionally, agriculture accounts for the bulk of employment in developing nations especially in the rural areas and contributes immensely to the growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), export earnings and poverty reduction in many countries. Given its dominance to the economic growth rate, it will remain a primary source of national economy and means of poverty reduction for many years to come (Tacoli 2004, p.2). It must be recognized that populations around the world are becoming increasingly urbanized. The pace of urbanization in less developed countries between 1950 and 1962 was very slow. According to the World Bank Report (2011, p.6), it is argued that especially sub Saharan Africa (SSA) the trend indicate that in 1960 only an average of 28% of the urban population lived in each country's largest city, but by 1980 this had risen to 36%. Similarly, the number of cities with a population of over half a million increased from a mere 3% in 1960, to 28% in 1980 (World Bank 2011, p.6). However, after this period the rate increased substantially. Most developing countries have noticed a transformation in their societies from rural to urban over the last three to four decades. The larger cities in developing countries have been growing very rapidly, often doubling in size every ten years (Thirlwall 1994, p.78).
农村和城市发展:影响发展中国家关于城乡分化和连续的不同观点的现实
近年来,以Akkoyunlu (2013, p.3)和Tacoli (2004, p.6)为代表的农村和城市发展研究表明,农村和城市地区在经济、金融和社会上都是相互关联的。农村和城市地区通过各种驱动因素之间的强烈相互作用,在制定减贫战略方面创造了一个关键的界面,特别是在城乡差距的背景下(Akkoyunlu(2013,第4页)。应该强调的是,农村和城市地区如何相交的重要性有利于农村和城市住区的积极发展成果。有证据表明,城乡联系为确定各种可能性提供了机会,可以利用这些可能性来刺激农村、地方经济活动和地方创新生产系统,这些系统既涉及农村地区,也涉及城市地区,但彼此之间不会造成损害。总的来说,这一分析标志着对农村和城市空间被视为彼此明显不同的现有情况的背离(Tacoli 2004,第6页)。这是一个经过深思熟虑的观点,即应该明确制定城乡发展战略,以促进农村发展,遏制城乡向城镇的流动(Tacoli 2004,第10页)。许多作家,如Thirlwall(1994,第88页)认为,如果世界上有平等的发展,就不应该有农村和城市地区之间的任何区别。这并不意味着它是农村和城市发展的配方或蓝图。理想的情况是,人们对关于农村和城市发展之间联系的学术论述越来越感兴趣。然而,许多发展中国家的城乡关系仍然从经济二元论的角度来看待,换句话说,城市部门和农村部门并存(Akkoyunlu 2013, p.4)。传统上,农业占发展中国家特别是农村地区就业的大部分,并对许多国家的国内生产总值增长、出口收入和减贫作出了巨大贡献。鉴于其对经济增长率的主导地位,在未来许多年里,它仍将是国民经济的主要来源和减贫手段(Tacoli 2004, p.2)。必须认识到,世界各地的人口正日益城市化。1950年至1962年间,欠发达国家的城市化速度非常缓慢。根据世界银行报告(2011年,第6页),有人认为,特别是撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的趋势表明,在1960年,平均只有28%的城市人口居住在每个国家最大的城市,但到1980年,这一比例已上升到36%。同样,人口超过50万的城市数量从1960年的3%增加到1980年的28%(世界银行2011年,第6页)。然而,在这一时期之后,这一比率大幅上升。大多数发展中国家都注意到,在过去三四十年间,它们的社会发生了从农村到城市的转变。发展中国家较大的城市增长非常迅速,往往每十年扩大一倍(Thirlwall 1994,第78页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信