Time scale of the growth progress in bacterial cultures: a self-consistent choice

A. Schiraldi, R. Foschino
{"title":"Time scale of the growth progress in bacterial cultures: a self-consistent choice","authors":"A. Schiraldi, R. Foschino","doi":"10.51520/2766-838x-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An empirical model describes the behavior of an ideal microbial culture that mimics the real one. The predicted growth curve, log[N(t)], includes the onset tail of the observed sigmoid trend, while the latency phase that precedes the cell duplication is a time gap, which does not coincide with the so-called lag phase of other models. Unsolved remains the issue of the time scale: does the origin of the time scale of the experimenter coincide with that of the microbial culture? The correlation between duration of latency phase and maximum slope of the growth trend allows determination of a “true” starting point of the growth progress as the origin of the time scale of the microbial culture. Rigid shifts in the time scale of the experimenter allow alignment of the growth trends of real microbial cultures (in excess substrate, in the same medium and at the same temperature), no matter the starting population density. The time scale of the bacterial culture allows a consistent evaluation of the extent of the latency phase that can include a “negative” time span, which is supposed to deal with some basal cell metabolism not aimed at duplication. Some examples, dealing with real psychrotrophic bacterial cultures, support the model and perfect the prediction of the extent of the latency phase at various temperatures.","PeriodicalId":409797,"journal":{"name":"RAS Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAS Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51520/2766-838x-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

An empirical model describes the behavior of an ideal microbial culture that mimics the real one. The predicted growth curve, log[N(t)], includes the onset tail of the observed sigmoid trend, while the latency phase that precedes the cell duplication is a time gap, which does not coincide with the so-called lag phase of other models. Unsolved remains the issue of the time scale: does the origin of the time scale of the experimenter coincide with that of the microbial culture? The correlation between duration of latency phase and maximum slope of the growth trend allows determination of a “true” starting point of the growth progress as the origin of the time scale of the microbial culture. Rigid shifts in the time scale of the experimenter allow alignment of the growth trends of real microbial cultures (in excess substrate, in the same medium and at the same temperature), no matter the starting population density. The time scale of the bacterial culture allows a consistent evaluation of the extent of the latency phase that can include a “negative” time span, which is supposed to deal with some basal cell metabolism not aimed at duplication. Some examples, dealing with real psychrotrophic bacterial cultures, support the model and perfect the prediction of the extent of the latency phase at various temperatures.
细菌培养物生长过程的时间尺度:一个自洽的选择
经验模型描述了模仿真实微生物培养物的理想微生物培养物的行为。预测的生长曲线log[N(t)]包含了观察到的s型趋势的起始尾部,而细胞复制之前的潜伏期是一个时间间隔,与其他模型的所谓滞后期并不重合。时间尺度的问题仍然没有解决:实验者的时间尺度的起源是否与微生物培养的时间尺度的起源一致?潜伏期持续时间与生长趋势的最大斜率之间的相关性允许确定生长过程的“真实”起点,作为微生物培养时间尺度的起源。实验时间尺度的刚性变化允许实际微生物培养物(在过量的基质中,在相同的培养基中,在相同的温度下)的生长趋势对齐,无论初始种群密度如何。细菌培养的时间尺度允许对潜伏期的程度进行一致的评估,潜伏期可能包括“负”时间跨度,这应该是为了处理一些不以复制为目标的基础细胞代谢。一些处理真正的嗜冷细菌培养物的例子支持了该模型,并完善了对不同温度下潜伏期范围的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信