Animal use in Life Sciences Education: Current Status, Teachers’ and Adolescents’ Attitudes and Alternatives

O. Amahmid, Y. E. Guamri, Mohamed Yazidi, B. Razoki, Khadija Kaid Rassou, Youness Rakibi, Ibrahim Farouk, Fadya Charkaoui
{"title":"Animal use in Life Sciences Education: Current Status, Teachers’ and Adolescents’ Attitudes and Alternatives","authors":"O. Amahmid, Y. E. Guamri, Mohamed Yazidi, B. Razoki, Khadija Kaid Rassou, Youness Rakibi, Ibrahim Farouk, Fadya Charkaoui","doi":"10.29333/aje.2019.428a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to explore Lower Secondary School curriculum of Life Sciences, in Morocco, to establish the current status of animal use and the extent at which it is a curriculum requirement for the introduction of the prescribed concepts and objectives. Two questionnaires were developed and administered to teachers and students to assess their attitudes towards animal use and dissection, as well as potential alternatives that could be used for replacement. The study revealed that several cited topics in the curriculum involve animal use and organ dissection. The majority of students (60.9%) and teachers (83.3%) had great interest in performing animal organ dissections, stating that it allowed better understanding, long-term knowledge and motivation. A proportion of participants felt negative emotions towards this practice. Many animals groups have been involved especially frogs and mammals. While most of teachers and students quoted that priority should be given to real hands-on experiments, alternatives preferred for replacement were videos and simulations. Animal use in education raises psychological, ethical, and environmental concerns. Hence, there is a need to use animal-free alternatives as they allow the achievement of the learning objectives more effectively and have several advantages over animal use.","PeriodicalId":314053,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Journal of Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.428a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aimed to explore Lower Secondary School curriculum of Life Sciences, in Morocco, to establish the current status of animal use and the extent at which it is a curriculum requirement for the introduction of the prescribed concepts and objectives. Two questionnaires were developed and administered to teachers and students to assess their attitudes towards animal use and dissection, as well as potential alternatives that could be used for replacement. The study revealed that several cited topics in the curriculum involve animal use and organ dissection. The majority of students (60.9%) and teachers (83.3%) had great interest in performing animal organ dissections, stating that it allowed better understanding, long-term knowledge and motivation. A proportion of participants felt negative emotions towards this practice. Many animals groups have been involved especially frogs and mammals. While most of teachers and students quoted that priority should be given to real hands-on experiments, alternatives preferred for replacement were videos and simulations. Animal use in education raises psychological, ethical, and environmental concerns. Hence, there is a need to use animal-free alternatives as they allow the achievement of the learning objectives more effectively and have several advantages over animal use.
生命科学教育中的动物使用:现状、教师和青少年的态度和选择
这项研究的目的是探索摩洛哥初中生命科学课程,以确定动物利用的现状,以及在多大程度上成为介绍规定概念和目标的课程要求。我们对教师和学生进行了两份问卷调查,以评估他们对动物使用和解剖的态度,以及可能用于替代的潜在替代品。研究表明,课程中引用的几个主题涉及动物使用和器官解剖。绝大多数学生(60.9%)和教师(83.3%)对动物器官解剖有浓厚的兴趣,认为可以更好地理解、长期了解和激励。一部分参与者对这种做法感到负面情绪。许多动物群体,尤其是青蛙和哺乳动物都被卷入其中。虽然大多数老师和学生都认为应该优先考虑真正的动手实验,但视频和模拟更适合替代。在教育中使用动物引起了心理、伦理和环境方面的关注。因此,有必要使用无动物替代品,因为它们可以更有效地实现学习目标,并且比动物使用有几个优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信