Liberating Women with Islam? The Islamists and Women's Issues in Jordan

Ibtesam Alatiyat, H. Barari
{"title":"Liberating Women with Islam? The Islamists and Women's Issues in Jordan","authors":"Ibtesam Alatiyat, H. Barari","doi":"10.1080/14690764.2010.546113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The question of where Jordanian Islamists stand on women's rights has generated a great deal of attention over the past few years. An analysis of recent shifts in gender relations and hierarchies within the Jordanian Islamic movement (namely the Muslim Brothers and their political wing the Islamic Action Front and the Islamic Centrist Party) reveals that over the past three decades their views on women's rights have shifted towards embracing a much wider and more visible participation of women in the public space and within the movement itself. This suggests that engaging Islamists in political processes helps a great deal in ‘detraditionalizing’ them. However, since 2003, the women's movement, supported by the Jordanian government, has aggressively promoted a CEDAW‐based discourse on rights that has challenged the Islamists to develop a more explicit discourse on women's rights. The new discourse is distinct in being promoted by women as well as men of the movement. This discourse is not entirely consistent with the above‐stated shifts and reveals a rejection of the body of rights suggested by CEDAW. Our analysis of the reaction to the CEDAW‐based discourse on women's rights shows that the Islamists base their opposition to CEDAW on an argument which states that Islam is concerned with justice rather than equality, yet this argument has not been consistently applied across a number of different issue areas, undermining the position of Islamists with regard to women's rights. The overall conclusion of the analysis is that definite change has occurred with regard to the role and status of women in Jordanian society through the activities of the women's movement and efforts to politically engage Islamists on this issue. Yet these changes remain precarious, as the views of Islamist political parties continue to border on traditionalism.","PeriodicalId":440652,"journal":{"name":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690764.2010.546113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract The question of where Jordanian Islamists stand on women's rights has generated a great deal of attention over the past few years. An analysis of recent shifts in gender relations and hierarchies within the Jordanian Islamic movement (namely the Muslim Brothers and their political wing the Islamic Action Front and the Islamic Centrist Party) reveals that over the past three decades their views on women's rights have shifted towards embracing a much wider and more visible participation of women in the public space and within the movement itself. This suggests that engaging Islamists in political processes helps a great deal in ‘detraditionalizing’ them. However, since 2003, the women's movement, supported by the Jordanian government, has aggressively promoted a CEDAW‐based discourse on rights that has challenged the Islamists to develop a more explicit discourse on women's rights. The new discourse is distinct in being promoted by women as well as men of the movement. This discourse is not entirely consistent with the above‐stated shifts and reveals a rejection of the body of rights suggested by CEDAW. Our analysis of the reaction to the CEDAW‐based discourse on women's rights shows that the Islamists base their opposition to CEDAW on an argument which states that Islam is concerned with justice rather than equality, yet this argument has not been consistently applied across a number of different issue areas, undermining the position of Islamists with regard to women's rights. The overall conclusion of the analysis is that definite change has occurred with regard to the role and status of women in Jordanian society through the activities of the women's movement and efforts to politically engage Islamists on this issue. Yet these changes remain precarious, as the views of Islamist political parties continue to border on traditionalism.
用伊斯兰教解放妇女?约旦的伊斯兰主义者和妇女问题
在过去的几年里,约旦伊斯兰主义者在妇女权利问题上的立场引起了极大的关注。对约旦伊斯兰运动(即穆斯林兄弟会及其政治派别伊斯兰行动阵线和伊斯兰中间派党)中性别关系和等级制度最近变化的分析显示,在过去三十年中,他们对妇女权利的看法已经转变为接受妇女在公共空间和运动本身中更广泛和更明显的参与。这表明,让伊斯兰主义者参与政治进程,在很大程度上有助于他们“去传统化”。然而,自2003年以来,妇女运动在约旦政府的支持下,积极推动基于《消除对妇女歧视公约》的权利论述,挑战伊斯兰主义者对妇女权利的更明确论述。新话语的独特之处在于,它是由女性和男性共同推动的。这一论述与上述转变并不完全一致,并揭示了对消除对妇女歧视委员会提出的一系列权利的拒绝。我们对以《消除对妇女歧视公约》为基础的关于妇女权利的论述的反应的分析表明,伊斯兰主义者反对《消除对妇女歧视公约》的理由是,伊斯兰教关心的是正义而不是平等,然而这一论点并没有始终适用于许多不同的问题领域,这削弱了伊斯兰主义者在妇女权利方面的立场。分析的总结论是,通过妇女运动的活动和在政治上使伊斯兰主义者参与这一问题的努力,妇女在约旦社会中的作用和地位已经发生了明确的变化。然而,这些变化仍然不稳定,因为伊斯兰政党的观点继续接近传统主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信