PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE POLITICS-ADMINISTRATION DICHOTOMY IN MALAWIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT

A. Chiweza, Y. Msiska
{"title":"PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE POLITICS-ADMINISTRATION DICHOTOMY IN MALAWIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT","authors":"A. Chiweza, Y. Msiska","doi":"10.55190/zahm4483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing from survey data and key informant interviews of local government councils in Malawi, this article investigates the nature of the relationship between politically-elected and appointed officials as well as the perceptions of the roles of political leaders and administrators in local government policy- making and implementation process. It notes that an efficient local government system requires a good linkage and crossing-point between the political and administrative leadership to ensure that polices are formulated and implemented effectively. The article reveals that in the midst of bureaucratic dominance, the complementarity partnership model is the most preferred by both elected members and administrators. However, this article finds that a significant number of administrators show some ambivalence towards leaving policy-making to elected members alone. Also, it reveals that a significant number of respondents recognize policy implementation to be within the exclusive purview of appointed public administrators. This means that the partnership model is seen to have a strong empirical logic among practicing local government administrators and elected members, thereby signifying their support for interconnectedness as well as the potential strengths of integrating politics and administration in policy development and implementation. Keywords: Administration, Council, Local Government, Politics, Policymaking","PeriodicalId":179506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55190/zahm4483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing from survey data and key informant interviews of local government councils in Malawi, this article investigates the nature of the relationship between politically-elected and appointed officials as well as the perceptions of the roles of political leaders and administrators in local government policy- making and implementation process. It notes that an efficient local government system requires a good linkage and crossing-point between the political and administrative leadership to ensure that polices are formulated and implemented effectively. The article reveals that in the midst of bureaucratic dominance, the complementarity partnership model is the most preferred by both elected members and administrators. However, this article finds that a significant number of administrators show some ambivalence towards leaving policy-making to elected members alone. Also, it reveals that a significant number of respondents recognize policy implementation to be within the exclusive purview of appointed public administrators. This means that the partnership model is seen to have a strong empirical logic among practicing local government administrators and elected members, thereby signifying their support for interconnectedness as well as the potential strengths of integrating politics and administration in policy development and implementation. Keywords: Administration, Council, Local Government, Politics, Policymaking
马拉维地方政府政治-行政二分法的实践和看法
根据马拉维地方政府委员会的调查数据和主要线人访谈,本文调查了政治选举和任命官员之间关系的性质,以及政治领导人和行政人员在地方政府政策制定和实施过程中的作用的看法。委员会注意到,一个有效的地方政府制度需要政治和行政领导之间有良好的联系和交叉点,以确保有效地制订和执行政策。研究发现,在官僚主义主导下,互补性伙伴关系模式是当选成员和管理者最青睐的模式。然而,本文发现,相当数量的行政人员对将政策制定只交给民选成员表现出一些矛盾心理。此外,调查还显示,相当数量的答复者承认政策的执行只属于被任命的公共行政人员的职权范围。这意味着伙伴关系模式在实践中的地方政府管理者和民选成员之间具有很强的经验逻辑,从而表明他们支持互联互通,以及在政策制定和实施中整合政治和行政的潜在优势。关键词:行政,议会,地方政府,政治,决策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信