Understanding Smoke Exposure Results: Pinot noir Baseline Concentrations of Smoke Impact Markers across Five Vintages

Caroline P. Merrell, T. Arvik, Ron C. Runnebaum
{"title":"Understanding Smoke Exposure Results: Pinot noir Baseline Concentrations of Smoke Impact Markers across Five Vintages","authors":"Caroline P. Merrell, T. Arvik, Ron C. Runnebaum","doi":"10.5344/catalyst.2020.20007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Goals: With increased wildfires in recent years, winemakers must be able to interpret analyses of smoke-related marker compounds to determine whether smoke intrusion has affected their wines. The goal of this study was to examine naturally-occurring, baseline levels of smoke exposure marker compounds in un-oaked Pinot noir to enable winemakers to better understand smoke exposure results. This study also sought to understand how baseline concentrations of smoke marker compounds change from year to year. Key Findings: Pinot noir wines from California and Oregon had detectable baseline levels of free and bound marker compounds, including guaiacol, 4-methylguaiacol, 4-ethylphenol, and m-, p-, and o-cresol. In 2019, the baseline free guaiacol concentration ranged from 1.2 to 2.3 µg/L, while total (free and bound) guaiacol ranged from 6.4 to 12.0 µg/L. The concentration of free guaiacol was greater in older vintages, while total guaiacol did not change much from year to year. The ratio of free to total guaiacol approached 1:2 after five years, suggesting baseline guaiacol may approach an equal ratio of free to bound over time. Impact and Significance: While baseline levels identified here were low, winemakers should become familiar with the baseline concentrations in their wines to better understand risk during smoke-impacted vintages. With increased analysis of non-smoke-impacted, baseline samples, it may be possible to create a variety-specific risk matrix for smoke exposure. Additionally, as wines age, free volatile smoke marker compounds may increase due to normal changes to baseline compounds and may not always represent smoke-related glycosides releasing free volatiles.","PeriodicalId":170363,"journal":{"name":"Catalyst: Discovery into Practice","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalyst: Discovery into Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5344/catalyst.2020.20007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summary Goals: With increased wildfires in recent years, winemakers must be able to interpret analyses of smoke-related marker compounds to determine whether smoke intrusion has affected their wines. The goal of this study was to examine naturally-occurring, baseline levels of smoke exposure marker compounds in un-oaked Pinot noir to enable winemakers to better understand smoke exposure results. This study also sought to understand how baseline concentrations of smoke marker compounds change from year to year. Key Findings: Pinot noir wines from California and Oregon had detectable baseline levels of free and bound marker compounds, including guaiacol, 4-methylguaiacol, 4-ethylphenol, and m-, p-, and o-cresol. In 2019, the baseline free guaiacol concentration ranged from 1.2 to 2.3 µg/L, while total (free and bound) guaiacol ranged from 6.4 to 12.0 µg/L. The concentration of free guaiacol was greater in older vintages, while total guaiacol did not change much from year to year. The ratio of free to total guaiacol approached 1:2 after five years, suggesting baseline guaiacol may approach an equal ratio of free to bound over time. Impact and Significance: While baseline levels identified here were low, winemakers should become familiar with the baseline concentrations in their wines to better understand risk during smoke-impacted vintages. With increased analysis of non-smoke-impacted, baseline samples, it may be possible to create a variety-specific risk matrix for smoke exposure. Additionally, as wines age, free volatile smoke marker compounds may increase due to normal changes to baseline compounds and may not always represent smoke-related glycosides releasing free volatiles.
了解烟雾暴露结果:五个年份黑皮诺葡萄酒烟雾影响标志物的基线浓度
摘要目标:随着近年来野火的增加,酿酒师必须能够解释与烟雾有关的标记化合物的分析,以确定烟雾入侵是否影响了他们的葡萄酒。本研究的目的是检测未橡木桶黑皮诺葡萄酒中自然产生的烟雾暴露标志化合物的基线水平,使酿酒师能够更好地了解烟雾暴露的结果。这项研究还试图了解烟雾标志物化合物的基线浓度如何逐年变化。主要发现:来自加利福尼亚和俄勒冈州的黑比诺葡萄酒具有可检测的游离和结合标记化合物的基线水平,包括愈创木酚、4-甲基愈创木酚、4-乙酚和间、对、邻甲酚。2019年,基线游离愈创木酚浓度范围为1.2至2.3 μ g/L,而总(游离和结合)愈创木酚浓度范围为6.4至12.0 μ g/L。游离愈创木酚的浓度在较老的年份更高,而总愈创木酚的浓度在逐年变化不大。五年后,游离愈创木酚与总愈创木酚的比例接近1:2,这表明随着时间的推移,基线愈创木酚的游离与结合比例可能接近相等。影响和意义:虽然这里确定的基线浓度很低,但酿酒师应该熟悉葡萄酒中的基线浓度,以便更好地了解受烟雾影响的年份的风险。随着对不受烟雾影响的基线样本分析的增加,有可能为烟雾暴露创建一个特定品种的风险矩阵。此外,随着葡萄酒的陈年,游离挥发性烟雾标志化合物可能会由于基线化合物的正常变化而增加,并且可能并不总是代表与烟雾有关的释放游离挥发物的苷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信