{"title":"A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE USE ON FACEBOOK: A STUDY OF PREMIUM TIMES NEWS HEADLINES","authors":"Rita Bossan, G. Oyedeji","doi":"10.47851/naujocommed.v1i1.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attaining national unity and cohesion is a function of deliberate strategic plans of different facets of human endeavour in a nation. The language front has important role to play in fostering national unity and cohesion in any country. The Nigeria and Africa situation is not an exception. The chaos and rivalry that have become an intrinsic experience for us in Nigeria and in fact, Africa is partly a function of careless and unchecked language use in the social media. This paper, therefore, explores the use and misuse of language on social media. The study examines the comments of Facebook users to online news headlines posted on Premium Times Facebook handle. A corpus of a week screenshot samples of these comments are collected out of which nine (9) were purposively selected for the analysis. These nine (9) data are grouped into five (5) texts. The selected data were analysed using Dell Hymes’ Ethnography of Speaking complemented by Theo van Leeuwen’s Identities and Subjectivity Model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). The paper uses the SPEAKING acronym as the theoretical insight and discussion was based on the postulations of the CDA model adopted. The study found that the responses from readers are mostly tilting towards their individual affiliations. Also, instances of arguments and rebuttals by readers reflect a situation where the polarity tilts in bidirectional positive in-group - “us” and negative out-group – “them” among the different affiliations the users represent. The study further found that copious use of vulgar expressions pervades the comments of readers. This study therefore concludes that such use of language cannot help Nigeria and Africa in its quest for unity. The study recommends that media literacy be taught in schools in order to entrench civility in the discussions of people on social media.","PeriodicalId":233484,"journal":{"name":"Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of Communication and Media Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of Communication and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47851/naujocommed.v1i1.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Attaining national unity and cohesion is a function of deliberate strategic plans of different facets of human endeavour in a nation. The language front has important role to play in fostering national unity and cohesion in any country. The Nigeria and Africa situation is not an exception. The chaos and rivalry that have become an intrinsic experience for us in Nigeria and in fact, Africa is partly a function of careless and unchecked language use in the social media. This paper, therefore, explores the use and misuse of language on social media. The study examines the comments of Facebook users to online news headlines posted on Premium Times Facebook handle. A corpus of a week screenshot samples of these comments are collected out of which nine (9) were purposively selected for the analysis. These nine (9) data are grouped into five (5) texts. The selected data were analysed using Dell Hymes’ Ethnography of Speaking complemented by Theo van Leeuwen’s Identities and Subjectivity Model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). The paper uses the SPEAKING acronym as the theoretical insight and discussion was based on the postulations of the CDA model adopted. The study found that the responses from readers are mostly tilting towards their individual affiliations. Also, instances of arguments and rebuttals by readers reflect a situation where the polarity tilts in bidirectional positive in-group - “us” and negative out-group – “them” among the different affiliations the users represent. The study further found that copious use of vulgar expressions pervades the comments of readers. This study therefore concludes that such use of language cannot help Nigeria and Africa in its quest for unity. The study recommends that media literacy be taught in schools in order to entrench civility in the discussions of people on social media.
实现民族团结和凝聚力是一个国家人类努力的不同方面的深思熟虑的战略计划的功能。在任何一个国家,语言战线在促进民族团结和凝聚力方面都发挥着重要作用。尼日利亚和非洲的情况也不例外。混乱和竞争已经成为我们尼日利亚乃至整个非洲的固有体验,部分原因是社交媒体上粗心和不受控制的语言使用。因此,本文探讨了社交媒体上语言的使用和误用。这项研究调查了Facebook用户对Premium Times Facebook账户上发布的在线新闻标题的评论。收集这些评论的一周截图样本的语料库,其中有目的地选择九(9)进行分析。这九(9)个数据被分成五(5)个文本。选取的数据采用戴尔·海姆斯的《说话人种学》和西奥·范·莱文的《批评性话语分析的身份与主体性模型》进行分析。本文以SPEAKING首字母缩略词为理论视角,并基于所采用的批评性话语分析模型的假设进行了讨论。研究发现,读者的反应大多倾向于他们个人的隶属关系。此外,读者的争论和反驳的实例反映了一种情况,即极性在用户所代表的不同隶属关系中双向倾斜,积极的群体内-“我们”和消极的群体外-“他们”。研究进一步发现,大量使用粗俗的表达充斥着读者的评论。因此,这项研究的结论是,这种语言的使用无助于尼日利亚和非洲寻求统一。该研究建议在学校教授媒体素养,以加强人们在社交媒体上讨论的文明。