الاختلاف في التفسير: مفهومه، نشأته، وتطوره (دراسة تحليلية تاريخيه)

Abdul Rasheed, Dr. Fazli Dayan
{"title":"الاختلاف في التفسير: مفهومه، نشأته، وتطوره (دراسة تحليلية تاريخيه)","authors":"Abdul Rasheed, Dr. Fazli Dayan","doi":"10.54262/irjis.04.01.a01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indeed, Allah, the exalted has revealed His book to the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and made it a proof of Prophetic authenticity. Almighty Allah, for the service of His book, created numerous people who spent their lives to elucidate the meanings and purposes of the holy Qur’ān according to their deductive and extractive capabilities. It is worth mentioning that the verses of the holy Qur’ān are of two types; one is unalterably fixed (muḥkam) which has a clearer meaning and cannot be subject to change or abrogation. While the other is unintelligible (mutashābih) this has multiple intending and subject to further investigation. In which the intellect, rational and logical understanding has a significant role to play for the suspension and otherwise the Lawgiver’s intention. And thus, in this case, juristic personal inferences can be expanded to various connotations for clarity or ambiguity to establish a real and ultimately required prescription. Resultantly, this breadth caused diversity among the Qur’ānic exegeses. Therefore, the present study provides a historical overview of disagreement(s) between the Qurānic commentators of the classical Islamic era; to let the readers know whether such discrepancy has arisen from assorted documented scientific and interpretational reasons? Or whether their dissension is based on their desires, incongruity, stinginess, haughtiness, or something that is a result of fanaticism and zealotry? Consequently, this research presents the origin and development of the disparity in Qur’ānic interpretation. Similarly, it also shed light on the aspect of those who laid the foundations of this field. More particularly, the companions, their successors and those who followed them in performing the duty of discernment miscellaneous meanings of the holy Qur’ān; make personal inferences by meditating Qur’ānic verses juristically, lexically and syntactically. Correspondingly, the breadth of ideas about the development of time; diverseness because of the dissimilar events along with the history of dissonance(s) in Qur’ānic interpretation keeping in view various periods and the stages of its emergence will be the center of debate in this article.","PeriodicalId":310030,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal on Islamic Studies (IRJIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal on Islamic Studies (IRJIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54262/irjis.04.01.a01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indeed, Allah, the exalted has revealed His book to the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and made it a proof of Prophetic authenticity. Almighty Allah, for the service of His book, created numerous people who spent their lives to elucidate the meanings and purposes of the holy Qur’ān according to their deductive and extractive capabilities. It is worth mentioning that the verses of the holy Qur’ān are of two types; one is unalterably fixed (muḥkam) which has a clearer meaning and cannot be subject to change or abrogation. While the other is unintelligible (mutashābih) this has multiple intending and subject to further investigation. In which the intellect, rational and logical understanding has a significant role to play for the suspension and otherwise the Lawgiver’s intention. And thus, in this case, juristic personal inferences can be expanded to various connotations for clarity or ambiguity to establish a real and ultimately required prescription. Resultantly, this breadth caused diversity among the Qur’ānic exegeses. Therefore, the present study provides a historical overview of disagreement(s) between the Qurānic commentators of the classical Islamic era; to let the readers know whether such discrepancy has arisen from assorted documented scientific and interpretational reasons? Or whether their dissension is based on their desires, incongruity, stinginess, haughtiness, or something that is a result of fanaticism and zealotry? Consequently, this research presents the origin and development of the disparity in Qur’ānic interpretation. Similarly, it also shed light on the aspect of those who laid the foundations of this field. More particularly, the companions, their successors and those who followed them in performing the duty of discernment miscellaneous meanings of the holy Qur’ān; make personal inferences by meditating Qur’ānic verses juristically, lexically and syntactically. Correspondingly, the breadth of ideas about the development of time; diverseness because of the dissimilar events along with the history of dissonance(s) in Qur’ānic interpretation keeping in view various periods and the stages of its emergence will be the center of debate in this article.
解释上的差异:概念、起源和演变(历史分析)
的确,至高无上的真主已将他的经典启示给先知穆罕默德(愿主福安之),并使它成为先知真实性的证明。全能的安拉,为了他的书的服务,创造了许多人,他们一生都在根据他们的演绎和提取能力来阐明神圣的古兰经ān的意义和目的。值得一提的是,古兰经ān的经文有两种类型;一种是不可改变的固定(muḥkam),其含义更明确,不能改变或废除。而另一个是难以理解的(mutashābih),这有多重意图,并受到进一步的调查。其中,理智、理性和逻辑的理解对于立法者的意图的中止和其他方面起着重要的作用。因此,在这种情况下,法律上的个人推理可以扩展到各种含义,以明确或模糊地建立一个真实的和最终需要的处方。结果,这种广度导致了古兰经ānic注释者之间的多样性。因此,本研究提供了古典伊斯兰时代Qurānic评论员之间分歧的历史概述;让读者知道这种差异是否源于各种文献记载的科学和解释原因?或者他们的分歧是基于他们的欲望,不和谐,吝啬,傲慢,或者是狂热和狂热的结果?因此,本研究揭示了古兰经ānic解释差异的起源和发展。同样,它也揭示了那些奠定这一领域基础的人的方面。更具体地说,他们的同伴,他们的继承者和那些跟随他们履行辨别职责的人古兰经的各种含义ān;通过在法律、词汇和句法上思考《古兰经》ānic经文,做出个人推论。与之相对应的是,关于时间发展的观念的广度;《古兰经》ānic诠释中不同事件的多样性以及不和谐的历史,将是本文讨论的中心,同时考虑到其出现的各个时期和阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信