THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF THE FOUNDER’S LIABILITY OF A LEGAL ENTITY UNDER UZBEK LAW

Nurillo Imomov
{"title":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF THE FOUNDER’S LIABILITY OF A LEGAL ENTITY UNDER UZBEK LAW","authors":"Nurillo Imomov","doi":"10.51788/tsul.rols.2021.5.4./mvfh8888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issues related to the liability of a legal entity, the existing problematic and conceptual aspects to be solved, the long-standing controversial issues should be analyzed on the basis of the current realities, market laws developed on the basis of economic and legal reforms in our country. Put simply, the responsibility of a legal entity means that it is liable for its obligations with the property belonging to it. In this case, the legal entity is liable for failure to fulfill its obligations with the property in its possession. However, this simple construction is not always sufficient for the liability of a legal entity. In many cases where liability for a legal person’s obligations arises, its property may be lost, in which case the problem arises as to who is liable. Indeed, as noted in the above paragraphs, it has been recognized that the essence of building a legal entity is to separate the assets of the founders and participants from the assets of the legal entity and the ownership of assets held by the legal entity. From this point of view, the insufficiency of the property held by the legal person to secure its liability means that the remaining claims of creditors will not be satisfied. However, in this case various abuses and scandals are possible on the part of the persons who violated the creditor’s interests and created the legal entity, benefited from it and directly carried out its activities. Thus, current legislation determines the relationship and responsibility of two independent persons - the legal entity itself and its founder (shareholders) in determining the liability of legal persons, and this approach is typical for almost all organizational-legal forms of legal entities.","PeriodicalId":102464,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.rols.2021.5.4./mvfh8888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issues related to the liability of a legal entity, the existing problematic and conceptual aspects to be solved, the long-standing controversial issues should be analyzed on the basis of the current realities, market laws developed on the basis of economic and legal reforms in our country. Put simply, the responsibility of a legal entity means that it is liable for its obligations with the property belonging to it. In this case, the legal entity is liable for failure to fulfill its obligations with the property in its possession. However, this simple construction is not always sufficient for the liability of a legal entity. In many cases where liability for a legal person’s obligations arises, its property may be lost, in which case the problem arises as to who is liable. Indeed, as noted in the above paragraphs, it has been recognized that the essence of building a legal entity is to separate the assets of the founders and participants from the assets of the legal entity and the ownership of assets held by the legal entity. From this point of view, the insufficiency of the property held by the legal person to secure its liability means that the remaining claims of creditors will not be satisfied. However, in this case various abuses and scandals are possible on the part of the persons who violated the creditor’s interests and created the legal entity, benefited from it and directly carried out its activities. Thus, current legislation determines the relationship and responsibility of two independent persons - the legal entity itself and its founder (shareholders) in determining the liability of legal persons, and this approach is typical for almost all organizational-legal forms of legal entities.
乌兹别克斯坦法律下法人实体创始人责任的理论与实践问题
有关法人责任的问题,存在的问题和概念性方面有待解决,长期存在争议的问题应根据当前的实际情况进行分析,市场规律是在我国经济法制改革的基础上发展起来的。简单地说,法人的责任是指法人对其财产的义务承担责任。在这种情况下,法人对其占有的财产不履行义务承担责任。然而,这种简单的解释并不总是足以解释法律实体的责任。在许多情况下,当法人的义务产生责任时,其财产可能会丢失,在这种情况下,谁负责的问题就产生了。的确,如上文各段所述,人们已认识到,建立一个法律实体的实质是将创始人和参与者的资产与法律实体的资产和法律实体所持有的资产所有权分开。从这个角度来看,法人所持有的财产不足以保证其责任,就意味着债权人的剩余债权不能得到满足。然而,在这种情况下,侵犯债权人利益、创建法人实体、从中受益并直接开展其活动的人可能会出现各种滥用和丑闻。因此,现行立法在确定法人责任时确定两个独立的人——法人本身及其创始人(股东)的关系和责任,这种方法几乎适用于所有法人的组织-法律形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信