Assessment of mobile phone applications feasibility on plant recognition: comparison with Google Lens AR-app

Z. Bilyk, Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, V. Shapovalov, A. Megalinska, Fabian Andruszkiewicz, A. Dołhańczuk-Śródka
{"title":"Assessment of mobile phone applications feasibility on plant recognition: comparison with Google Lens AR-app","authors":"Z. Bilyk, Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, V. Shapovalov, A. Megalinska, Fabian Andruszkiewicz, A. Dołhańczuk-Śródka","doi":"10.31812/123456789/4403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is devoted to systemizing all mobile applications used during the STEM-classes and can be used to identify plants. There are 10 mobile applications that are plant identifiers worldwide. These applications can be divided into three groups, such as plant identifiers that can analyze photos, plant classification provides the possibility to identify plants manually, plants-care apps that remind water of the plant, or change the soil. In this work, mobile apps such as Flora Incognita, PlantNet, PlantSnap, PictureThis, LeafSnap, Seek, PlantNet were analyzed for usability parameters and accuracy of identification. To provide usability analysis, a survey of experts of digital education on installation simplicity, level of friendliness of the interface, and correctness of picture processing. It is proved that Flora Incognita and PlantNet are the most usable and the most informative interface from plant identification apps. However, they were characterized by significantly lower accuracy compared to Google Lens results. Further comparison of the usability of applications that have been tested in the article with Google Lens, proves that Google Lens characterize by better usability and therefore, Google Lens is the most recommended app to use to provide plant identification during biology classes.","PeriodicalId":274384,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The paper is devoted to systemizing all mobile applications used during the STEM-classes and can be used to identify plants. There are 10 mobile applications that are plant identifiers worldwide. These applications can be divided into three groups, such as plant identifiers that can analyze photos, plant classification provides the possibility to identify plants manually, plants-care apps that remind water of the plant, or change the soil. In this work, mobile apps such as Flora Incognita, PlantNet, PlantSnap, PictureThis, LeafSnap, Seek, PlantNet were analyzed for usability parameters and accuracy of identification. To provide usability analysis, a survey of experts of digital education on installation simplicity, level of friendliness of the interface, and correctness of picture processing. It is proved that Flora Incognita and PlantNet are the most usable and the most informative interface from plant identification apps. However, they were characterized by significantly lower accuracy compared to Google Lens results. Further comparison of the usability of applications that have been tested in the article with Google Lens, proves that Google Lens characterize by better usability and therefore, Google Lens is the most recommended app to use to provide plant identification during biology classes.
植物识别手机应用可行性评估:与谷歌Lens ar应用的比较
本文致力于将stem课程中使用的所有移动应用程序系统化,并可用于识别植物。全世界有10个移动应用程序是植物标识符。这些应用程序可以分为三组,例如可以分析照片的植物识别器,植物分类提供了手动识别植物的可能性,植物护理应用程序提醒植物的水,或改变土壤。在这项工作中,我们分析了Flora Incognita、PlantNet、PlantSnap、PictureThis、LeafSnap、Seek、PlantNet等移动应用程序的可用性参数和识别准确性。提供可用性分析,对数字教育专家就安装简单性、界面友好程度和图像处理正确性进行调查。事实证明,Flora Incognita和PlantNet是植物识别应用程序中最实用、最具信息量的界面。然而,与谷歌Lens的结果相比,它们的准确性明显较低。进一步将文章中测试的应用程序与Google Lens的可用性进行比较,证明Google Lens的特点是可用性更好,因此Google Lens是生物课上最推荐使用的植物识别应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信