Incorporating anchored inflation expectations in the Phillips curve and in the derivation of OECD measures of the unemployment gap

Elena Rusticelli, D. Turner, M. Cavalleri
{"title":"Incorporating anchored inflation expectations in the Phillips curve and in the derivation of OECD measures of the unemployment gap","authors":"Elena Rusticelli, D. Turner, M. Cavalleri","doi":"10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2015-5JRP104KJGMR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inflation has become much less sensitive to movements in unemployment in recent decades. A common explanation for this change is that inflation expectations have become better anchored as a consequence of credible inflation targeting by central banks. In order to evaluate this hypothesis, the paper compares two competing empirical specifications across all OECD economies, where competing specifications correspond to the “former” and “new” specification for deriving measures of the unemployment gap which underlie the OECD Economic Outlook projections. The former OECD specification can be characterised as a traditional “backward-looking” Phillips curve, where current inflation is partly explained by an autoregressive distributed lag process of past inflation representing both inertia and inflation expectations formed on the basis of recent inflation outcomes. Conversely, the new approach adjusts this specification to incorporate the notion that inflation expectations are anchored around the central bank’s inflation objective. The main finding of the paper is that the latter approach systematically out-performs the former for an overwhelming majority of OECD countries over a recent sample period. Relative to the backward-looking specification, the anchored expectations approach also tends to imply larger unemployment gaps for those countries for which actual unemployment has increased the most. Moreover, the anchored expectations Phillips curve reduces real-time revisions to the unemployment gap, although these still remain uncomfortably large, in the case of countries where there have been large changes in unemployment. JEL classification: C22, E24, E31, J64 Keywords: Anchored expectations, Phillips curve, equilibrium unemployment, real-time revisions","PeriodicalId":416490,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2015-5JRP104KJGMR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Inflation has become much less sensitive to movements in unemployment in recent decades. A common explanation for this change is that inflation expectations have become better anchored as a consequence of credible inflation targeting by central banks. In order to evaluate this hypothesis, the paper compares two competing empirical specifications across all OECD economies, where competing specifications correspond to the “former” and “new” specification for deriving measures of the unemployment gap which underlie the OECD Economic Outlook projections. The former OECD specification can be characterised as a traditional “backward-looking” Phillips curve, where current inflation is partly explained by an autoregressive distributed lag process of past inflation representing both inertia and inflation expectations formed on the basis of recent inflation outcomes. Conversely, the new approach adjusts this specification to incorporate the notion that inflation expectations are anchored around the central bank’s inflation objective. The main finding of the paper is that the latter approach systematically out-performs the former for an overwhelming majority of OECD countries over a recent sample period. Relative to the backward-looking specification, the anchored expectations approach also tends to imply larger unemployment gaps for those countries for which actual unemployment has increased the most. Moreover, the anchored expectations Phillips curve reduces real-time revisions to the unemployment gap, although these still remain uncomfortably large, in the case of countries where there have been large changes in unemployment. JEL classification: C22, E24, E31, J64 Keywords: Anchored expectations, Phillips curve, equilibrium unemployment, real-time revisions
将锚定通胀预期纳入菲利普斯曲线和经合组织失业缺口测算方法的推导中
近几十年来,通胀对失业率的变化已变得不那么敏感了。对这种变化的一种常见解释是,由于央行制定了可信的通胀目标,通胀预期得到了更好的锚定。为了评估这一假设,本文比较了所有经合组织经济体中两个相互竞争的经验规范,其中相互竞争的规范对应于“前”和“新”规范,用于推导经合组织经济展望预测基础上的失业差距的测量。以前的经合组织规范可以被描述为传统的“向后看”菲利普斯曲线,其中当前的通胀在一定程度上可以用过去通胀的自回归分布滞后过程来解释,这一过程既代表了惯性,也代表了基于最近通胀结果形成的通胀预期。相反,新方法调整了这一规范,以纳入通胀预期围绕央行通胀目标的概念。本文的主要发现是,在最近的样本期内,对于绝大多数经合组织国家来说,后一种方法的系统表现优于前一种方法。相对于向后看的规范,锚定预期方法也往往意味着那些实际失业率增加最多的国家的失业差距更大。此外,锚定的预期菲利普斯曲线减少了对失业缺口的实时修正,尽管在失业率发生重大变化的国家,这些修正仍然大得令人不安。关键词:锚定预期,菲利普斯曲线,均衡失业,实时修正
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信