Clinical Feasibility of Personalized Articulating Knee Joint Distraction

Struik T, Custers Rjh, Besselink Nj, Jaspers Jen, Marijnissen Aka, Lafeber Fpjg, Mastbergen Sc
{"title":"Clinical Feasibility of Personalized Articulating Knee Joint Distraction","authors":"Struik T, Custers Rjh, Besselink Nj, Jaspers Jen, Marijnissen Aka, Lafeber Fpjg, Mastbergen Sc","doi":"10.26420/austinjorthopaderheumatol.2021.1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Knee Joint Distraction (KJD) is a joint preserving procedure that can postpone arthroplasty in case of knee osteoarthritis. Distraction is applied with an external rigid fixation device for six weeks. To reduce the burden during treatment due to the absence of joint flexion, we developed a personalized articulating KJD-device. Its technical feasibility, joint-specific motion reproduction, was previously pre-clinically demonstrated. In this study, clinical feasibility of this new device was tested in three patients. Materials and Methods: Patients received conventional KJD treatment with a rigid distraction device. After two to four weeks, the device was removed during a one-day hospital visit and the joint was flexed on a Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) device until 30 degrees of flexion was reached, or motion became too painful. Subsequently, the articulating frame was assembled and personalized with custom hinge parts based on a non-invasive joint motion measurement. Weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing radiographs were intended to be taken at 0, 15, and 30 degrees of flexion for joint space width measurements. Finally, the articulating device was replaced by the rigid distractor and conventional treatment was continued. Results: For none of the patients, the articulating distractor could be personalized adequately. Insufficient joint motion was achieved during CPM due to intolerable pain at the pin sites. Conclusions: Despite confirmation of joint-specific articulating distraction on cadaveric legs, clinical feasibility could not be demonstrated, mainly due to painful motion of soft tissues along the bone pins. Safe and solid anatomical location of pins is considered to hamper articulating distraction.","PeriodicalId":399704,"journal":{"name":"Austin Journal of Orthopedics & Rheumatology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin Journal of Orthopedics & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjorthopaderheumatol.2021.1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Knee Joint Distraction (KJD) is a joint preserving procedure that can postpone arthroplasty in case of knee osteoarthritis. Distraction is applied with an external rigid fixation device for six weeks. To reduce the burden during treatment due to the absence of joint flexion, we developed a personalized articulating KJD-device. Its technical feasibility, joint-specific motion reproduction, was previously pre-clinically demonstrated. In this study, clinical feasibility of this new device was tested in three patients. Materials and Methods: Patients received conventional KJD treatment with a rigid distraction device. After two to four weeks, the device was removed during a one-day hospital visit and the joint was flexed on a Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) device until 30 degrees of flexion was reached, or motion became too painful. Subsequently, the articulating frame was assembled and personalized with custom hinge parts based on a non-invasive joint motion measurement. Weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing radiographs were intended to be taken at 0, 15, and 30 degrees of flexion for joint space width measurements. Finally, the articulating device was replaced by the rigid distractor and conventional treatment was continued. Results: For none of the patients, the articulating distractor could be personalized adequately. Insufficient joint motion was achieved during CPM due to intolerable pain at the pin sites. Conclusions: Despite confirmation of joint-specific articulating distraction on cadaveric legs, clinical feasibility could not be demonstrated, mainly due to painful motion of soft tissues along the bone pins. Safe and solid anatomical location of pins is considered to hamper articulating distraction.
个性化关节牵拉术的临床可行性
膝关节牵张术(KJD)是一种保存关节的手术,可以在膝关节骨性关节炎的情况下推迟关节置换术。使用外刚性固定装置牵引6周。为了减轻治疗期间由于关节不屈曲造成的负担,我们开发了一种个性化的关节kjd装置。其技术可行性,关节特定运动复制,先前已在临床前证明。在本研究中,我们在三个患者身上测试了这种新装置的临床可行性。材料与方法:患者接受常规KJD治疗,采用刚性牵引装置。两到四周后,在一天的医院就诊期间取出该装置,关节在连续被动运动(CPM)装置上屈曲,直到屈曲达到30度,或者运动变得太痛苦。随后,在非侵入式关节运动测量的基础上,用定制铰链部件组装和个性化铰接框架。在0度、15度和30度屈曲处拍摄负重和非负重x线片,测量关节间隙宽度。最后用刚性牵张器代替关节辅助装置,继续常规治疗。结果:所有患者均不能充分个性化使用发音牵引器。在CPM期间,由于针位无法忍受的疼痛,关节运动不足。结论:尽管在尸体腿上证实了关节特异性关节牵张,但临床可行性尚不能证明,主要是由于软组织沿骨钉的疼痛运动。钉的安全可靠的解剖位置被认为可以阻止关节分散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信