Evaluation of the Organic Soil Compressibility from In-Situ and Laboratory Tests for Road Application

I. Chmielewska
{"title":"Evaluation of the Organic Soil Compressibility from In-Situ and Laboratory Tests for Road Application","authors":"I. Chmielewska","doi":"10.7250/bjrbe.2021-16.526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic soil is characterised by high compressibility and should be improved so that it can be used for construction. The use of every method of soil improvement requires knowledge of the compressibility parameters. One of these parameters is the constrained modulus. The constrained modulus can be determined using laboratory or in-situ tests. In this study, the constrained modulus of organic soil was determined using oedometer and piezocone tests (CPTU). The author analysed subsoil under an approximately 250 m section of a designed road in north-eastern Poland. The constrained modulus of organic soil sampled from four different depths was determined in oedometer tests. Piezocone tests were conducted at 18 points located every 15 m along the length of the section concerned. To determine the constrained modulus based on the cone resistance from CPTU tests, the knowledge of the α and αM coefficients is needed. For the tested soil, the optimal range of the α coefficient from 0.4 to 0.7 was determined. The αM coefficient ranged from 0.4 to 0.8. The value of the constrained modulus of organic soil obtained from the oedometer tests, depending on the effective stress, ranged from approximately 100 kPa to 400 kPa. The constrained modulus of the tested soil decreased with depth, which both research methods proved.","PeriodicalId":297140,"journal":{"name":"The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2021-16.526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic soil is characterised by high compressibility and should be improved so that it can be used for construction. The use of every method of soil improvement requires knowledge of the compressibility parameters. One of these parameters is the constrained modulus. The constrained modulus can be determined using laboratory or in-situ tests. In this study, the constrained modulus of organic soil was determined using oedometer and piezocone tests (CPTU). The author analysed subsoil under an approximately 250 m section of a designed road in north-eastern Poland. The constrained modulus of organic soil sampled from four different depths was determined in oedometer tests. Piezocone tests were conducted at 18 points located every 15 m along the length of the section concerned. To determine the constrained modulus based on the cone resistance from CPTU tests, the knowledge of the α and αM coefficients is needed. For the tested soil, the optimal range of the α coefficient from 0.4 to 0.7 was determined. The αM coefficient ranged from 0.4 to 0.8. The value of the constrained modulus of organic soil obtained from the oedometer tests, depending on the effective stress, ranged from approximately 100 kPa to 400 kPa. The constrained modulus of the tested soil decreased with depth, which both research methods proved.
道路应用中有机土壤压缩性的原位和室内试验评价
有机土壤具有高压缩性的特点,应加以改良,使其可用于建筑。使用每一种土壤改良方法都需要了解压缩性参数。其中一个参数是约束模量。约束模量可以通过实验室或现场测试来确定。在这项研究中,有机土壤的约束模量是用测压仪和压锥试验(CPTU)确定的。作者分析了波兰东北部一条设计道路约250米路段的底土。在土壤测量试验中,测定了四个不同深度的有机土壤的约束模量。在沿相关截面长度每隔15米的18个点进行了压锥测试。为了根据CPTU试验的锥阻力确定约束模量,需要知道α和α m系数。对于试验土,确定了α系数的最佳取值范围为0.4 ~ 0.7。αM系数在0.4 ~ 0.8之间。根据有效应力的不同,有机土壤的约束模量值从大约100千帕到400千帕不等。试验土的约束模量随深度的增加而减小,两种研究方法都证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信