Association of Body Mass Index and Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Hamideh Haj Nasiri, Nasim Bahrami, Kelly-Ann Allen, Zainab Alimoradi
{"title":"Association of Body Mass Index and Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies","authors":"Hamideh Haj Nasiri, Nasim Bahrami, Kelly-Ann Allen, Zainab Alimoradi","doi":"10.2174/1573404817666210714113537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nDysmenorrhea or menstrual pain is a commonly occurring disorder in reproductive age women with different proposed risk factors, including body mass index.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to investigate the association between body mass index and dysmenorrhea using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach.\n\n\n\nAcademic databases Scopus, PubMed CENTRAL, Embase, ProQuest, Science Direct, and ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar- were searched systematically from inception until the end of February 2020. Original researches published in English with observational designs were included to examine the association of body mass index and dysmenorrhea as the primary outcome. Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Due to the variation of reported data across studies, all data were converted to Pearson correlation coefficient and corrected by transforming to fisher’s Z score. Then meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with Der-Simonian and Laird method.\n\n\n\nA total of 61 studies with 57,079 participants, of which 25,044 reported having dysmenorrhea, were included. While publication bias was probable, results were corrected using the fill amp; trim method. The updated results based on this method showed that pooled Fisher’s z-score for the association of body mass index and dysmenorrhea was 0.04 (95% CI: -0.009; 0.085). The pooled estimated effect size of correlation showed a trivial to slight correlation between body mass index and dysmenorrhea with corrected fisher’s z score of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.08; 0.17, I2=95%).\n\n\n\nNo association was found between body mass index and dysmenorrhea. But this finding should be interpreted with caution considering the included studies' limitations.\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817666210714113537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea or menstrual pain is a commonly occurring disorder in reproductive age women with different proposed risk factors, including body mass index. This study aimed to investigate the association between body mass index and dysmenorrhea using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. Academic databases Scopus, PubMed CENTRAL, Embase, ProQuest, Science Direct, and ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar- were searched systematically from inception until the end of February 2020. Original researches published in English with observational designs were included to examine the association of body mass index and dysmenorrhea as the primary outcome. Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Due to the variation of reported data across studies, all data were converted to Pearson correlation coefficient and corrected by transforming to fisher’s Z score. Then meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with Der-Simonian and Laird method. A total of 61 studies with 57,079 participants, of which 25,044 reported having dysmenorrhea, were included. While publication bias was probable, results were corrected using the fill amp; trim method. The updated results based on this method showed that pooled Fisher’s z-score for the association of body mass index and dysmenorrhea was 0.04 (95% CI: -0.009; 0.085). The pooled estimated effect size of correlation showed a trivial to slight correlation between body mass index and dysmenorrhea with corrected fisher’s z score of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.08; 0.17, I2=95%). No association was found between body mass index and dysmenorrhea. But this finding should be interpreted with caution considering the included studies' limitations.
体重指数与痛经的关系:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
痛经或经期疼痛是育龄妇女常见的疾病,有不同的危险因素,包括体重指数。本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析的方法探讨体重指数与痛经之间的关系。学术数据库Scopus、PubMed CENTRAL、Embase、ProQuest、Science Direct、ISI Web of Science和Google Scholar从成立到2020年2月底进行了系统搜索。用英文发表的原始研究纳入了观察性设计,以检查体重指数和痛经之间的关系作为主要结局。纽卡斯尔渥太华量表用于评价研究的方法学质量。由于各研究报告的数据存在差异,所有数据均转换为Pearson相关系数,并通过转换为fisher Z分数进行校正。采用Der-Simonian和Laird随机效应模型进行meta分析。共纳入61项研究,57079名参与者,其中25044人报告有痛经。虽然可能存在发表偏倚,但使用填充放大器对结果进行了校正;修剪方法。基于该方法的更新结果显示,体重指数与痛经相关性的合并Fisher 's z-score为0.04 (95% CI: -0.009;0.085)。综合估计的相关效应大小显示,体重指数和痛经之间存在轻微或轻微的相关性,校正后的fisher’s z评分为0.12 (95% CI: 0.08;0.17, I2 = 95%)。没有发现体重指数与痛经之间的联系。但考虑到纳入研究的局限性,这一发现应谨慎解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信