Prevalence, Risk Factors and Antimicrobial Resistance of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Among Antenatal Women

Muktikesh Dash, S. Sahu, I. Mohanty, M. V. Narasimham, J. Turuk, R. Sahu
{"title":"Prevalence, Risk Factors and Antimicrobial Resistance of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Among Antenatal Women","authors":"Muktikesh Dash, S. Sahu, I. Mohanty, M. V. Narasimham, J. Turuk, R. Sahu","doi":"10.4103/2278-960X.118647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) in antenatal women is microbiological diagnosis and if untreated have 20-30 fold increased risk of developing pyelonephritis during pregnancy. Aim: The prospective study was conducted to determine the prevalence, risk factors and antibiotic resistance related to ABU in antenatal women. Subjects and Methods: A total of 287 asymptomatic pregnant women who attended the antenatal clinic at a tertiary care hospital, Odisha, India from July 2012 to December 2012 were enrolled. Two consecutively voided urine specimens were collected by clean-catch midstream urine technique for culture. The urine samples were processed and microbial isolates were identifi ed by conventional methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on all bacterial isolates by Kirby Bauer’s disc diff usion method. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Quick Calcs Statistical Software Inc., USA. Inferential statistics was done by Chi-square (2) test and a P < 0.05 was considered signifi cant.  Results: The prevalence of ABU in antenatal women was 11.5% (33/287). Lower socio-economic status and low level of education were signifi cant risk factors related to ABU (P=0.02). Parity, maternal and gestational age was not signifi cantly associated with ABU. Escherichia coli (54.5%, 18/33) were the most prevalent isolate followed by Enterococcus faecalis (15.2%, 5/33). Nitrofurantoin was the most eff ective antibiotic, showed resistance rate of 3% (1/33) for both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Conclusion: Routine screening using urine culture method should be performed for ABU in early pregnancy. Specifi c guidelines should be issued and followed for testing antimicrobial susceptibility with safe drugs in antenatal women. Empirical treatment with nitrofurantoin can be recommended, which is a safe drug and active for both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Keywords: Antenatal women, antibiotic resistance, asymptomatic bacteriuria, prevalence, risk factors","PeriodicalId":356195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-960X.118647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) in antenatal women is microbiological diagnosis and if untreated have 20-30 fold increased risk of developing pyelonephritis during pregnancy. Aim: The prospective study was conducted to determine the prevalence, risk factors and antibiotic resistance related to ABU in antenatal women. Subjects and Methods: A total of 287 asymptomatic pregnant women who attended the antenatal clinic at a tertiary care hospital, Odisha, India from July 2012 to December 2012 were enrolled. Two consecutively voided urine specimens were collected by clean-catch midstream urine technique for culture. The urine samples were processed and microbial isolates were identifi ed by conventional methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on all bacterial isolates by Kirby Bauer’s disc diff usion method. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Quick Calcs Statistical Software Inc., USA. Inferential statistics was done by Chi-square (2) test and a P < 0.05 was considered signifi cant.  Results: The prevalence of ABU in antenatal women was 11.5% (33/287). Lower socio-economic status and low level of education were signifi cant risk factors related to ABU (P=0.02). Parity, maternal and gestational age was not signifi cantly associated with ABU. Escherichia coli (54.5%, 18/33) were the most prevalent isolate followed by Enterococcus faecalis (15.2%, 5/33). Nitrofurantoin was the most eff ective antibiotic, showed resistance rate of 3% (1/33) for both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Conclusion: Routine screening using urine culture method should be performed for ABU in early pregnancy. Specifi c guidelines should be issued and followed for testing antimicrobial susceptibility with safe drugs in antenatal women. Empirical treatment with nitrofurantoin can be recommended, which is a safe drug and active for both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Keywords: Antenatal women, antibiotic resistance, asymptomatic bacteriuria, prevalence, risk factors
产前妇女无症状细菌性尿症患病率、危险因素及耐药性分析
背景:无症状性细菌尿症(ABU)是产前妇女的微生物诊断,如果不治疗,在妊娠期间发生肾盂肾炎的风险增加20-30倍。目的:前瞻性研究产前妇女ABU的患病率、危险因素及抗生素耐药性。研究对象和方法:选取2012年7月至2012年12月在印度奥里萨邦一家三级医院产前门诊就诊的287名无症状孕妇。采用中游清尿技术采集连续2例尿标本进行培养。对尿样进行处理,并用常规方法对分离的微生物进行鉴定。采用Kirby Bauer纸片扩散法对所有分离菌进行药敏试验。数据分析使用GraphPad Quick Calcs统计软件公司,美国。推论统计采用卡方(2)检验,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:产前妇女ABU患病率为11.5%(33/287)。社会经济地位低、文化程度低是与ABU相关的显著危险因素(P=0.02)。胎次、孕母和胎龄与ABU无显著相关。大肠杆菌感染率最高(54.5%,18/33),其次是粪肠球菌(15.2%,5/33)。呋喃妥英是最有效的抗生素,对革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌的耐药率均为3%(1/33)。结论:早期妊娠应采用尿培养法对ABU进行常规筛查。应发布并遵循具体的指导方针,对产前妇女使用安全药物进行抗菌药物敏感性测试。硝基呋喃妥英是一种安全的药物,对革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌都有活性,可推荐经验性治疗。关键词:产前妇女,抗生素耐药,无症状细菌,患病率,危险因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信