Violazioni amministrative in campo forestale. Confronto fra normative regionali

Stefano Gerbaldo
{"title":"Violazioni amministrative in campo forestale. Confronto fra normative regionali","authors":"Stefano Gerbaldo","doi":"10.4129/IFM.2020.3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work is proposed as a contribution to discussion about new Italian forest legislation and as a possible starting point for future policies. Some regional regulations have been compared for what concerns the administrative sanctioning rules applied in the sector. To give concreteness to the present argument, a specific case study has been carried out in the province of Cuneo (Piedmont, Italy). The istance has been chosen for its representativeness and high frequency, being its dendrometric parameters common in other regional contexts. Specifically, a pure meso-eutrophic beechwood has been analyzed. This has revealed a certain lack of homogeneity in the attribution of the form of forest management (coppice vs. highforest management systems). In fact there are different legal definitions of their dendrometric parameters. As a result, there are different silvicultural treatments to apply and very different levels of growing stock (in terms of number of trees, canopy cover area or tree volume) to be released. But it is above all the estimations of the allowable cut considered illegal (i.e. in stock volume and in number of trees), and even more the amounts of the administrative penalties that display the greatest differences. These differences would be even more relevant in the case of implementation of the European Union Regulation no. 995/2010, the so-called “Due Diligence”, which contrasts the trade of illegally sourced timber, and enumerates cases of law infringements strictly dependent on the configuration of the administrative offenses defined by regional regulations. The study carried out therefore highlights the opportunity to evaluate, in the appropriate areas of interinstitutional collaboration, the control algorithms for the best possible harmonization of the applicable regulations in Italy; the final goal should be the reduction of possible competitive imbalances between various companies operating in different regional contexts.","PeriodicalId":336087,"journal":{"name":"L'italia Forestale E Montana","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'italia Forestale E Montana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4129/IFM.2020.3.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work is proposed as a contribution to discussion about new Italian forest legislation and as a possible starting point for future policies. Some regional regulations have been compared for what concerns the administrative sanctioning rules applied in the sector. To give concreteness to the present argument, a specific case study has been carried out in the province of Cuneo (Piedmont, Italy). The istance has been chosen for its representativeness and high frequency, being its dendrometric parameters common in other regional contexts. Specifically, a pure meso-eutrophic beechwood has been analyzed. This has revealed a certain lack of homogeneity in the attribution of the form of forest management (coppice vs. highforest management systems). In fact there are different legal definitions of their dendrometric parameters. As a result, there are different silvicultural treatments to apply and very different levels of growing stock (in terms of number of trees, canopy cover area or tree volume) to be released. But it is above all the estimations of the allowable cut considered illegal (i.e. in stock volume and in number of trees), and even more the amounts of the administrative penalties that display the greatest differences. These differences would be even more relevant in the case of implementation of the European Union Regulation no. 995/2010, the so-called “Due Diligence”, which contrasts the trade of illegally sourced timber, and enumerates cases of law infringements strictly dependent on the configuration of the administrative offenses defined by regional regulations. The study carried out therefore highlights the opportunity to evaluate, in the appropriate areas of interinstitutional collaboration, the control algorithms for the best possible harmonization of the applicable regulations in Italy; the final goal should be the reduction of possible competitive imbalances between various companies operating in different regional contexts.
与森林有关的行政违规行为。区域法规的比较
建议将目前的工作作为对讨论新的意大利森林立法的贡献,并作为未来政策的可能起点。一些地区法规已经被比较了哪些涉及行政制裁规则适用于该部门。为了使目前的论点具体化,在库尼奥省(意大利皮埃蒙特)进行了具体的个案研究。选择该距离是因为其代表性和高频率,这是其在其他区域环境中常见的树形参数。具体地说,分析了一种纯中富营养化山毛榉。这表明森林管理形式的归属(灌木林与高林管理制度)在某种程度上缺乏同质性。事实上,它们的岩石学参数有不同的法律定义。因此,有不同的造林处理和非常不同水平的蓄积量(在树木数量、树冠覆盖面积或树木体积方面)被释放。但是,最重要的是对被认为是非法的允许采伐的估计(即在蓄积量和树木数量上),甚至是行政处罚的数额,显示出最大的差异。在执行欧洲联盟第19号条例的情况下,这些差异将更加相关。995/2010,所谓的“尽职调查”,对比了非法来源的木材贸易,并列举了严格依赖区域法规定义的行政违法配置的违法案件。因此,所进行的研究突出表明有机会在适当的机构间合作领域评价控制算法,以便尽可能地协调意大利的适用条例;最终目标应该是减少在不同区域经营的不同公司之间可能出现的竞争不平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信