Assessment of Fatigue through Working Environment and Hazardous Driving Behavior among Drivers

Mery Helda G. Canada, Jenile O. Jaurigue, K. Antonio, Joshua B. Ilagan, Y. Prasetyo
{"title":"Assessment of Fatigue through Working Environment and Hazardous Driving Behavior among Drivers","authors":"Mery Helda G. Canada, Jenile O. Jaurigue, K. Antonio, Joshua B. Ilagan, Y. Prasetyo","doi":"10.1145/3460824.3460849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are scientific studies about Fatigue that leads to decrease in driving performance displaying inattentive and slower reaction time. The review of the literature has provided factors which can influence the onset of fatigue: sleep factors, work factors and health factors which is a major safety hazard to drivers. The research study applied Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the interrelationship among driving hours (DH), sleep duration (SD), type of driver (TOD), experience, violations, type of route (TR), comfortability on car controls (CC), traffic density (TD), weather, habit, stress, personality, and fatigue simultaneously. Fatigue is additionally measured by Driver Fatigue Assessment Scale which the researchers have made based on Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). 254 respondents answered the online survey form conducted by the researchers with 31 questions in total designed to assess fatigue through working environment and hazardous driving among drivers. At the end of the survey, Driver Fatigue Assessment Scale is added to be ranked by 1-5 which is never to always on how frequent they experience the fatigue based on the questions given. The results showed that experience had significant direct effect on DH, TOD was found had significant direct effect on CC, and habit was also found had significant direct effects on personality and stress. In addition, TOD was also found to be a good predictor to CC. The findings suggest that higher value of habit achieved, the higher probability to have stress while the lower value of stress achieved, the lower probability to have fatigue among drivers.","PeriodicalId":315518,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3460824.3460849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are scientific studies about Fatigue that leads to decrease in driving performance displaying inattentive and slower reaction time. The review of the literature has provided factors which can influence the onset of fatigue: sleep factors, work factors and health factors which is a major safety hazard to drivers. The research study applied Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the interrelationship among driving hours (DH), sleep duration (SD), type of driver (TOD), experience, violations, type of route (TR), comfortability on car controls (CC), traffic density (TD), weather, habit, stress, personality, and fatigue simultaneously. Fatigue is additionally measured by Driver Fatigue Assessment Scale which the researchers have made based on Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). 254 respondents answered the online survey form conducted by the researchers with 31 questions in total designed to assess fatigue through working environment and hazardous driving among drivers. At the end of the survey, Driver Fatigue Assessment Scale is added to be ranked by 1-5 which is never to always on how frequent they experience the fatigue based on the questions given. The results showed that experience had significant direct effect on DH, TOD was found had significant direct effect on CC, and habit was also found had significant direct effects on personality and stress. In addition, TOD was also found to be a good predictor to CC. The findings suggest that higher value of habit achieved, the higher probability to have stress while the lower value of stress achieved, the lower probability to have fatigue among drivers.
工作环境对驾驶员疲劳及危险驾驶行为的影响
有科学研究表明疲劳会导致驾驶性能下降,表现为注意力不集中和反应时间变慢。文献综述提供了影响疲劳发生的因素:睡眠因素、工作因素和健康因素,这是司机的主要安全隐患。本研究运用结构方程模型(SEM),同时分析了驾驶时数(DH)、睡眠时长(SD)、驾驶员类型(TOD)、经验、违规行为、路线类型(TR)、汽车控制舒适性(CC)、交通密度(TD)、天气、习惯、压力、个性、疲劳等因素之间的相互关系。在疲劳评定量表(FAS)和疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)的基础上,编制了驾驶员疲劳评定量表,对驾驶员疲劳程度进行了测量。254名受访者回答了由研究人员进行的在线调查表格,共有31个问题,旨在通过工作环境和危险驾驶来评估驾驶员的疲劳程度。在调查结束时,驾驶员疲劳评估量表被添加到1-5的排名中,这是基于他们根据给出的问题体验疲劳的频率。结果表明,经验对健康有显著的直接影响,TOD对健康有显著的直接影响,习惯对个性和压力也有显著的直接影响。此外,TOD对CC也有很好的预测作用。研究结果表明,驾驶员达到习惯值越高,产生压力的可能性越大,而达到习惯值越低,产生疲劳的可能性越小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信