Stato dell’arte e analisi statistica della pianificazione a livello comunale in Basilicata

Salvatore Cipollaro, Giuseppe Eligiato, Antonio Racana, F. Antonucci
{"title":"Stato dell’arte e analisi statistica della pianificazione a livello comunale in Basilicata","authors":"Salvatore Cipollaro, Giuseppe Eligiato, Antonio Racana, F. Antonucci","doi":"10.4129/IFM.2020.4.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work has the purpose to define current level of Basilicata Region’s forest management planning (PAF) and to collect different data concerning to municipal agro-silvo-pastoral properties, administrated until today, and about the planning level reached. In order to allow a correct comparison about different forest populations, the acquired data have been aggregated into homogeneous categories. According to PAF information in this paper are listed: working circle types, main forest system used type, main and dominant species and age-class distribution. Data analysis were based on a comparative analysis about of spatial impact of managed areas if related to analyzed factors, in order to evaluate the areal distribution of collected information. In both provinces (Potenza and Matera), according to data analysis, the working circles that appear to be more frequent have productive and protective functions, while the most extensive type of management forms is high forest system. The comparison between tree factors like main species, managed area and provinces show that in Matera Province the dominant species is the Turkey oak ( Quercus cerris L.); instead beech ( Fagus sylvatica L.) is the most widespread one in province of Potenza. Moreover Quercus is the most represented genus on the regional territory, if you add mixed oak woods to the Turkey oak. Age-class distribution is an another factor which make a difference between Potenza and Matera provinces: while in Matera is easier to found young forests, uneven-aged management is typical of Potenza’s area, and in both cases we found high forest system. The connection between main species and forest system show us that simple coppice system is typical of mixed oak woods instead beech or Turkey oak pure stand are previously managed as high forest system. In a large quantity of cases, Basilicata Regions coppices are however aged, as shown by the age-class distribution analysis. Finally this work try to understand the relationship between forest management and forest fires.","PeriodicalId":336087,"journal":{"name":"L'italia Forestale E Montana","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'italia Forestale E Montana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4129/IFM.2020.4.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work has the purpose to define current level of Basilicata Region’s forest management planning (PAF) and to collect different data concerning to municipal agro-silvo-pastoral properties, administrated until today, and about the planning level reached. In order to allow a correct comparison about different forest populations, the acquired data have been aggregated into homogeneous categories. According to PAF information in this paper are listed: working circle types, main forest system used type, main and dominant species and age-class distribution. Data analysis were based on a comparative analysis about of spatial impact of managed areas if related to analyzed factors, in order to evaluate the areal distribution of collected information. In both provinces (Potenza and Matera), according to data analysis, the working circles that appear to be more frequent have productive and protective functions, while the most extensive type of management forms is high forest system. The comparison between tree factors like main species, managed area and provinces show that in Matera Province the dominant species is the Turkey oak ( Quercus cerris L.); instead beech ( Fagus sylvatica L.) is the most widespread one in province of Potenza. Moreover Quercus is the most represented genus on the regional territory, if you add mixed oak woods to the Turkey oak. Age-class distribution is an another factor which make a difference between Potenza and Matera provinces: while in Matera is easier to found young forests, uneven-aged management is typical of Potenza’s area, and in both cases we found high forest system. The connection between main species and forest system show us that simple coppice system is typical of mixed oak woods instead beech or Turkey oak pure stand are previously managed as high forest system. In a large quantity of cases, Basilicata Regions coppices are however aged, as shown by the age-class distribution analysis. Finally this work try to understand the relationship between forest management and forest fires.
巴西利卡塔市规划的最新技术和统计分析
这项工作的目的是确定巴西利卡塔地区森林管理规划(PAF)的当前水平,并收集有关迄今为止管理的市政农牧业的不同数据,以及关于已达到的规划水平。为了能够对不同的森林种群进行正确的比较,已将获得的数据汇总为同类类别。根据PAF资料,列出了工作圈类型、主要林系使用类型、主要优势种和年龄级分布。数据分析是基于对管理区域的空间影响进行对比分析,如果与所分析的因素相关,以评估收集到的信息的区域分布。根据数据分析,在这两个省(波坦察和马泰拉),似乎更频繁的工作圈具有生产和保护功能,而最广泛的经营形式类型是高林系统。主要树种、管理面积和省区树木因子比较表明,马特拉省优势树种为土耳其栎(Quercus cerris L.);相反,山毛榉(Fagus sylvatica L.)是波坦察省最广泛的一种。此外,如果你把混合橡木加到土耳其橡木中,栎树是该地区最具代表性的属。年龄等级分布是另一个导致波坦察省和马泰拉省之间差异的因素:马泰察省更容易发现幼林,而波坦察地区的典型特征是年龄不均匀管理,在这两个地区我们都发现了高森林系统。主要树种与森林系统之间的联系表明,混合栎林的典型特征是简单的乔木系统,而不是以前作为高林系统管理的山毛榉或土耳其栎纯林。然而,在大量的情况下,巴西利卡塔地区的copcops是年龄的,如年龄级分布分析所示。最后,本工作试图了解森林管理和森林火灾之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信