S. Aslan, A. Türkvatan, A. Güner, S. Kahraman, Ümit Bulut, Gokhan Demirci, Enes Arslan, Özge Çelik, M. Ertürk
{"title":"Effect of Aortic Angulation on Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with the Self-Expanding Portico Valve","authors":"S. Aslan, A. Türkvatan, A. Güner, S. Kahraman, Ümit Bulut, Gokhan Demirci, Enes Arslan, Özge Çelik, M. Ertürk","doi":"10.51645/khj.2022.m244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Aortic angulation (AA), defined as the angle between the aortic annulus plane and the horizontal plane, may result in failed prosthesis positioning. The effect of AA on the procedural and short-term outcomes with the portico valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of AA on device success and early outcomes of TAVI using a selfexpanding portico valve.\n Patients and Methods: Preoperative computed tomography scans of 121 consecutive patients treated with the portico valve were analyzed. TAVI device success and outcomes were determined according to VARC-3 definitions. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean AA.\n Results: The mean AA was 48.7 ± 8.9°. There were no differences in technical success (92.2 vs 89.5%, p= 0.604), device success (81.2% vs 77.2%, p= 0.582), and early safety endpoints (68.8% vs 61.4%, p= 0.397) between the AA≤ 48° and AA>48° groups. The frequency and severity of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) was statistically higher in patients with AA> 48° (p= 0.028). Moreover, an increased AA was also associated with valve malposition (12.3% vs. 1.6%, p= 0.018), prolonged procedure time (85 ± 26 vs. 75 ± 20 minutes, p= 0.028), and greater Δimplantation depth (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 mm; p<0.001).\n Conclusion: Despite comparable device success and early outcomes rates, increased AA is associated with higher rates of PAR and valve malposition, with the self-expanding portico valve.","PeriodicalId":239985,"journal":{"name":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51645/khj.2022.m244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Aortic angulation (AA), defined as the angle between the aortic annulus plane and the horizontal plane, may result in failed prosthesis positioning. The effect of AA on the procedural and short-term outcomes with the portico valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of AA on device success and early outcomes of TAVI using a selfexpanding portico valve.
Patients and Methods: Preoperative computed tomography scans of 121 consecutive patients treated with the portico valve were analyzed. TAVI device success and outcomes were determined according to VARC-3 definitions. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean AA.
Results: The mean AA was 48.7 ± 8.9°. There were no differences in technical success (92.2 vs 89.5%, p= 0.604), device success (81.2% vs 77.2%, p= 0.582), and early safety endpoints (68.8% vs 61.4%, p= 0.397) between the AA≤ 48° and AA>48° groups. The frequency and severity of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) was statistically higher in patients with AA> 48° (p= 0.028). Moreover, an increased AA was also associated with valve malposition (12.3% vs. 1.6%, p= 0.018), prolonged procedure time (85 ± 26 vs. 75 ± 20 minutes, p= 0.028), and greater Δimplantation depth (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 mm; p<0.001).
Conclusion: Despite comparable device success and early outcomes rates, increased AA is associated with higher rates of PAR and valve malposition, with the self-expanding portico valve.
主动脉角(Aortic angle, AA)定义为主动脉环平面与水平面之间的夹角,可能导致假体定位失败。AA对经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)的过程和短期结果的影响尚未得到充分的研究。本研究旨在评估AA对使用自膨胀门廊瓣膜的TAVI装置成功和早期结果的影响。患者与方法:分析121例连续行门柱瓣膜手术患者的术前计算机断层扫描结果。根据VARC-3定义确定TAVI装置的成功和结果。患者根据平均AA分为两组。结果:平均AA为48.7±8.9°。AA≤48°组和AA>48°组在技术成功率(92.2 vs 89.5%, p= 0.604)、器械成功率(81.2% vs 77.2%, p= 0.582)和早期安全终点(68.8% vs 61.4%, p= 0.397)方面均无差异。AA> 48°的患者瓣旁主动脉瓣返流(PAR)发生频率和严重程度有统计学意义(p= 0.028)。此外,AA升高还与瓣膜错位(12.3% vs. 1.6%, p= 0.018)、手术时间延长(85±26 vs. 75±20分钟,p= 0.028)和更深的Δimplantation(2.2±0.5 vs. 0.8±0.1 mm;p < 0.001)。结论:尽管器械成功率和早期预后率相当,但自膨胀门廊瓣膜的AA增加与更高的PAR和瓣膜错位率相关。