Analysis of the Subjectivity Level in Fake News Fragments

Lucas Lima Vieira, Caio Libânio Melo Jerônimo, C. E. Campelo, L. Marinho
{"title":"Analysis of the Subjectivity Level in Fake News Fragments","authors":"Lucas Lima Vieira, Caio Libânio Melo Jerônimo, C. E. Campelo, L. Marinho","doi":"10.1145/3428658.3430978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread of fake news is increasingly worrying society and demanding approaches for mitigation. Although many approaches have been proposed to fake news detection, there is still a lack of works that deeply investigate their structure. Our study has been motivated by two findings discussed in existing works: the first is the fact that fake news usually mix real and fake information to mislead readers; the second is that subjective language is a resource commonly exploited by fake news producers. Therefore, to better understand how fake news is structured, we perform an analysis on the way the subjective language is exploited in different situations inside the fake news documents. For this, we built a dataset by manually identifying fake parts of news articles, and we also propose tags to categorize the fragments in documents. The proposed tags categorize the fake news fragments according to their kind of falsehood in document. To reveal subjectivity nuances within the fragments, we use the Word Movers Distance and a set of subjectivity lexicons in the Portuguese language. Our results indicate that the fragmentation of news allows the identification of subjectivity markers that cannot be identified when considering the entire documents.","PeriodicalId":350776,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3428658.3430978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The widespread of fake news is increasingly worrying society and demanding approaches for mitigation. Although many approaches have been proposed to fake news detection, there is still a lack of works that deeply investigate their structure. Our study has been motivated by two findings discussed in existing works: the first is the fact that fake news usually mix real and fake information to mislead readers; the second is that subjective language is a resource commonly exploited by fake news producers. Therefore, to better understand how fake news is structured, we perform an analysis on the way the subjective language is exploited in different situations inside the fake news documents. For this, we built a dataset by manually identifying fake parts of news articles, and we also propose tags to categorize the fragments in documents. The proposed tags categorize the fake news fragments according to their kind of falsehood in document. To reveal subjectivity nuances within the fragments, we use the Word Movers Distance and a set of subjectivity lexicons in the Portuguese language. Our results indicate that the fragmentation of news allows the identification of subjectivity markers that cannot be identified when considering the entire documents.
假新闻片段的主体性水平分析
假新闻的广泛传播日益令社会担忧,并要求采取缓解措施。虽然人们提出了许多检测假新闻的方法,但对其结构进行深入研究的工作仍然缺乏。我们的研究受到现有研究中讨论的两个发现的推动:第一,假新闻通常将真实信息和虚假信息混合起来误导读者;第二,主观语言是假新闻制造者经常利用的资源。因此,为了更好地理解假新闻的结构,我们对假新闻文档中不同情况下主观语言的利用方式进行了分析。为此,我们通过手动识别新闻文章的虚假部分建立了一个数据集,并且我们还提出了标记来对文档中的片段进行分类。所提出的标签根据其在文件中的虚假程度对假新闻片段进行分类。为了揭示碎片中主体性的细微差别,我们使用了单词移动距离和一套葡萄牙语主体性词汇。我们的研究结果表明,新闻的碎片化可以识别主体性标记,而在考虑整个文档时无法识别主体性标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信