What Drives Risk Perception? A Global Survey with Financial Professionals and Lay People

Felix Holzmeister, J. Huber, Michael Kirchler, F. Lindner, U. Weitzel, Stefan Zeisberger
{"title":"What Drives Risk Perception? A Global Survey with Financial Professionals and Lay People","authors":"Felix Holzmeister, J. Huber, Michael Kirchler, F. Lindner, U. Weitzel, Stefan Zeisberger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3374893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk is an integral part of many economic decisions and is vitally important in finance. Despite extensive research on decision making under risk, little is known about how risks are actually perceived by financial professionals, the key players in global financial markets. In a large-scale survey experiment with 2,213 finance professionals and 4,559 laypeople in nine countries representing ~50% of the world’s population and more than 60% of the world’s gross domestic product, we expose participants to return distributions with equal expected return, and we systematically vary the distributions’ next three higher moments. Of these, skewness is the only moment that systematically affects financial professionals’ perception of financial risk. Strikingly, variance does not influence risk perception, even though return volatility is the most common risk measure in finance in both academia and the industry. When testing other, compound risk measures, the probability to experience losses is the strongest predictor of what is perceived as being risky. Analyzing professionals’ propensity to invest, skewness and loss probability also have strong predictive power, while volatility and kurtosis have some additional effect. Our results are very similar for laypeople, and they are robust across and within countries with different cultural backgrounds, as well as for different job fields of professionals. This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, decision analysis.","PeriodicalId":400873,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Information","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"69","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3374893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

Abstract

Risk is an integral part of many economic decisions and is vitally important in finance. Despite extensive research on decision making under risk, little is known about how risks are actually perceived by financial professionals, the key players in global financial markets. In a large-scale survey experiment with 2,213 finance professionals and 4,559 laypeople in nine countries representing ~50% of the world’s population and more than 60% of the world’s gross domestic product, we expose participants to return distributions with equal expected return, and we systematically vary the distributions’ next three higher moments. Of these, skewness is the only moment that systematically affects financial professionals’ perception of financial risk. Strikingly, variance does not influence risk perception, even though return volatility is the most common risk measure in finance in both academia and the industry. When testing other, compound risk measures, the probability to experience losses is the strongest predictor of what is perceived as being risky. Analyzing professionals’ propensity to invest, skewness and loss probability also have strong predictive power, while volatility and kurtosis have some additional effect. Our results are very similar for laypeople, and they are robust across and within countries with different cultural backgrounds, as well as for different job fields of professionals. This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, decision analysis.
什么驱动风险认知?对金融专业人士和非专业人士的全球调查
风险是许多经济决策的一个组成部分,在金融中至关重要。尽管对风险下的决策进行了广泛的研究,但对于金融专业人士(全球金融市场的关键参与者)实际上如何感知风险,人们知之甚少。在一项大规模的调查实验中,我们对来自9个国家的2213名金融专业人士和4559名非专业人士进行了调查,这些国家占世界人口的50%,占世界国内生产总值的60%以上。我们让参与者接触到具有相同预期回报的回报分布,并系统地改变了未来三个更高时刻的分布。其中,偏度是唯一系统性影响金融专业人士对金融风险感知的时刻。引人注目的是,方差并不影响风险感知,即使回报波动率是学术界和行业中最常见的金融风险度量。在测试其他复合风险指标时,经历损失的概率是被认为有风险的最强预测器。分析专业人员的投资倾向、偏度和损失概率也具有较强的预测能力,而波动率和峰度也有一定的附加作用。我们的结果对于外行人来说非常相似,而且在不同文化背景的国家和内部,以及不同工作领域的专业人士,结果都很稳健。这篇论文被Yuval Rottenstreich接受,决策分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信