Teaching Controversy in Social Science Class

A. Purnomo, Wasino, Suyahmo, Tri Astuti
{"title":"Teaching Controversy in Social Science Class","authors":"A. Purnomo, Wasino, Suyahmo, Tri Astuti","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200620.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"---The controversy matters in teaching learning process is menacing, because it could be breaking down the unity and social-bounding within community. There is consequence if the controversy subject is given in the classroom. The teacher has to be ready to handle the social-stability that could happen. This research was aimed to describe teachers effort to prepare and carry out social studies learning on controversial material. The research approach is qualitative. The study was conducted on social studies teachers in Pekalongan City, Central Java. The focus of the study is the learning of social studies teachers in controversy material. Data collection is observation, interviews and documents. Data analysis using interactive analysis. The results of the study were the learning of material controversy in social studies has not been well constructed by the teacher. The teacher has not carried out material analysis by separating material that can be developed to grow the critical power of students because it contains controversial material. Thus, the learning that he does also uses a learning model that is not based on material. It happens because the teacher's educational background is monodisciplinary, material analysis does not involve teacher professional groups, and lack of understanding of the material controversy in social studies learning.","PeriodicalId":428575,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

---The controversy matters in teaching learning process is menacing, because it could be breaking down the unity and social-bounding within community. There is consequence if the controversy subject is given in the classroom. The teacher has to be ready to handle the social-stability that could happen. This research was aimed to describe teachers effort to prepare and carry out social studies learning on controversial material. The research approach is qualitative. The study was conducted on social studies teachers in Pekalongan City, Central Java. The focus of the study is the learning of social studies teachers in controversy material. Data collection is observation, interviews and documents. Data analysis using interactive analysis. The results of the study were the learning of material controversy in social studies has not been well constructed by the teacher. The teacher has not carried out material analysis by separating material that can be developed to grow the critical power of students because it contains controversial material. Thus, the learning that he does also uses a learning model that is not based on material. It happens because the teacher's educational background is monodisciplinary, material analysis does not involve teacher professional groups, and lack of understanding of the material controversy in social studies learning.
社会科学课堂教学之争
——在教学过程中引起争议的问题,有可能破坏社区内部的团结和社会关系,因此具有威胁性。如果在课堂上提出有争议的话题,就会有后果。教师必须准备好应对可能发生的社会稳定。本研究旨在描述教师在准备和开展有争议材料的社会研究学习方面所做的努力。研究方法是定性的。这项研究是在中爪哇省贝加隆岸市的社会研究教师中进行的。本研究的重点是社会学教师学习中的争议材料。数据收集是观察、访谈和文件。使用交互式分析进行数据分析。研究结果表明,社会学科教材的学习争议并没有被教师很好地建构。教师没有进行材料分析,将可以培养学生批判能力的材料分离出来,因为其中包含有争议的材料。因此,他所做的学习也使用了一种不基于材料的学习模式。这是因为教师的教育背景是单一学科的,材料分析没有涉及教师专业群体,对社会学学习中的材料争议缺乏认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信