Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Performance & Sustainable Stakeholder Accounting

W. Richard Sherman
{"title":"Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Performance & Sustainable Stakeholder Accounting","authors":"W. Richard Sherman","doi":"10.19030/IBER.V1I3.3903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disclosures of a corporation‟s socially responsible (CSR) activities and measurement of its performance in those activities are uneven, inconsistent, and incomparable. Given the absence of reporting standards, this is not surprising. This paper explores ways to \"account for\" CSR and presents an example of “sustainable stakeholder accounting” that can be used to integrate corporate social performance (CSP) into the financial statements which provide information for so many economic decisions. It suggests how the development of indices of social responsibility may facilitate analysis of a company's performance by quantifying and objectifying what is clearly a value-laden area. However, this will only be possible if current accounting standards are modified. Indeed, one of the primary objectives of this paper is to advocate changes in current accounting reporting practices so that a various aspects of CSR/CSP are made more transparent and can be more objectively assessed by the stakeholders who are impacted. To accomplish this, the form and substance of these disclosures must have “bottom line” meaning – and these disclosures should be mandated by accounting and securities regulations, not left to the discretion of individual companies.","PeriodicalId":406250,"journal":{"name":"International Business & Economics Research Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business & Economics Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/IBER.V1I3.3903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Disclosures of a corporation‟s socially responsible (CSR) activities and measurement of its performance in those activities are uneven, inconsistent, and incomparable. Given the absence of reporting standards, this is not surprising. This paper explores ways to "account for" CSR and presents an example of “sustainable stakeholder accounting” that can be used to integrate corporate social performance (CSP) into the financial statements which provide information for so many economic decisions. It suggests how the development of indices of social responsibility may facilitate analysis of a company's performance by quantifying and objectifying what is clearly a value-laden area. However, this will only be possible if current accounting standards are modified. Indeed, one of the primary objectives of this paper is to advocate changes in current accounting reporting practices so that a various aspects of CSR/CSP are made more transparent and can be more objectively assessed by the stakeholders who are impacted. To accomplish this, the form and substance of these disclosures must have “bottom line” meaning – and these disclosures should be mandated by accounting and securities regulations, not left to the discretion of individual companies.
企业社会责任、企业社会绩效与可持续利益相关者会计
公司社会责任(CSR)活动的披露和对其在这些活动中的表现的衡量是不平衡的、不一致的和不可比较的。考虑到报告标准的缺失,这并不奇怪。本文探讨了“考虑”企业社会责任的方法,并提出了一个“可持续利益相关者会计”的例子,可用于将企业社会绩效(CSP)整合到财务报表中,为许多经济决策提供信息。它表明,社会责任指数的发展如何通过量化和客观化一个明显充满价值的领域,来促进对公司业绩的分析。然而,只有修改现行会计准则,这才有可能实现。事实上,本文的主要目标之一是倡导当前会计报告实践的变化,以便CSR/CSP的各个方面变得更加透明,并且可以由受影响的利益相关者更客观地评估。要做到这一点,这些披露的形式和内容必须有“底线”的含义——这些披露应该由会计和证券法规强制执行,而不是留给个别公司自由裁量权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信