COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SEMANTICS OF THE LEXEME MOUTH IN ENGLISH

Y. Milkevich
{"title":"COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SEMANTICS OF THE LEXEME MOUTH IN ENGLISH","authors":"Y. Milkevich","doi":"10.18522/1995-0640-2022-4-37-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cognitive approach to the analysis of the lexical meaning of words makes it possible to explain the complex semantic structures of linguistic units by means of identifying cognitive models and mechanisms. These cognitive constructs underlie the formation of both literary and non-literary meanings of words. Somatic vocabulary, i. e. words naming parts of the human body, is of particular interest to cognitive linguists, as it clearly demonstrates the effect of one of the main postulates of cognitive linguistics, the postulate of embodied mind. Moreover, the physical, structural and functional properties of body parts also have a potential in forming the semantics conceptualisation of the lexemes. The data obtained from BNC of the lexeme mouth, 500 citations, give the following results. The research shows that the literal meaning of the lexeme mouth is based on its perception as a container (MOUTH AS A CONTAINER), as a static object and as an object with inherent physiological properties (MOUTH AS A OBJECT (STATIC \\ PHYSIOLOGICAL)). The collocations of mouth in that meaning is limited to a certain group of prepositions, verbs and adjectives. In some cases the literal meaning has a strong symbolic connotation which is easily inferred. The connotations reflect positive and negative feelings and states of a person. This fact confirms the thesis about the close interrelation of the internal state of a person and its external physiological manifestations. We single out positive and negative semantic prosody of these citations, such as firmness, attractiveness, anger, irritation, etc. The non-literal metonymic meaning of mouth gives evidence of the models MOUTH FOR ITS PARTS, MOUTH FOR A PERSON, MOUTH FOR ACTIVITY with their sub-models. The metonymic relations between the two concepts of each model are connected by contiguity, as both concepts are located inside one specific idealized cognitive model describing mouth as a body part, a person and human activities.","PeriodicalId":228573,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2022-4-37-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cognitive approach to the analysis of the lexical meaning of words makes it possible to explain the complex semantic structures of linguistic units by means of identifying cognitive models and mechanisms. These cognitive constructs underlie the formation of both literary and non-literary meanings of words. Somatic vocabulary, i. e. words naming parts of the human body, is of particular interest to cognitive linguists, as it clearly demonstrates the effect of one of the main postulates of cognitive linguistics, the postulate of embodied mind. Moreover, the physical, structural and functional properties of body parts also have a potential in forming the semantics conceptualisation of the lexemes. The data obtained from BNC of the lexeme mouth, 500 citations, give the following results. The research shows that the literal meaning of the lexeme mouth is based on its perception as a container (MOUTH AS A CONTAINER), as a static object and as an object with inherent physiological properties (MOUTH AS A OBJECT (STATIC \ PHYSIOLOGICAL)). The collocations of mouth in that meaning is limited to a certain group of prepositions, verbs and adjectives. In some cases the literal meaning has a strong symbolic connotation which is easily inferred. The connotations reflect positive and negative feelings and states of a person. This fact confirms the thesis about the close interrelation of the internal state of a person and its external physiological manifestations. We single out positive and negative semantic prosody of these citations, such as firmness, attractiveness, anger, irritation, etc. The non-literal metonymic meaning of mouth gives evidence of the models MOUTH FOR ITS PARTS, MOUTH FOR A PERSON, MOUTH FOR ACTIVITY with their sub-models. The metonymic relations between the two concepts of each model are connected by contiguity, as both concepts are located inside one specific idealized cognitive model describing mouth as a body part, a person and human activities.
英语词素口的语义认知分析
词汇意义的认知分析方法可以通过识别认知模式和认知机制来解释语言单位复杂的语义结构。这些认知结构是词汇的文学和非文学意义形成的基础。躯体词汇,即命名人体各部分的词汇,是认知语言学家特别感兴趣的,因为它清楚地证明了认知语言学的一个主要假设的影响,即具体化的思想假设。此外,身体部位的物理、结构和功能特性也有可能形成词汇的语义概念化。从词位口的BNC中获得的数据,500次引用,得出如下结果。研究表明,词素“嘴”的字面意义是基于其作为容器(mouth as a container)、作为静态对象和作为具有固有生理特性的对象(mouth as a object (static \ physiological))的感知。在这个意义上,嘴巴的搭配仅限于一组介词、动词和形容词。在某些情况下,字面意义具有强烈的象征意义,这很容易推断出来。其内涵反映了一个人积极和消极的感受和状态。这一事实证实了关于一个人的内部状态与其外部生理表现密切相关的论点。我们挑选出这些引文的积极和消极语义韵律,如坚定、吸引力、愤怒、刺激等。“嘴”的非字面转喻意义提供了“嘴为其部件”、“嘴为一个人”、“嘴为活动”及其子模型的证据。每个模型的两个概念之间的转喻关系是通过相邻性连接起来的,因为这两个概念都位于一个特定的理想化认知模型中,将嘴描述为身体部位、人以及人类活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信