Risk Management for Energy Efficiency Projects in Developing Countries

P. Kleindorfer
{"title":"Risk Management for Energy Efficiency Projects in Developing Countries","authors":"P. Kleindorfer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1579938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper addresses risk management fundamentals for energy efficiency (EE) projects in developing countries. The starting point for this paper is that there are many profitable EE projects in nearly every industrial enterprise that are simply not implemented. Four problems are often identified as the culprits for failing to harvest such projects: 1) lack of a rational and feasible approach to finance these projects; 2) lack of a rational internal management approach in the enterprise to package these projects in such a manner that they can be identified and implemented while the “plant is running”; 3) the high perceived risk of these projects; and 4) the fact that management is often simply unaware of the existence of EE projects of value. This paper is primarily focused on the third of these failure factors, risk, but touches also on the fourth factor since reducing project risk is predicated on understanding and measurement of EE benefits. The paper begins with a simple framework that emphasizes two dimensions of the organizational and contractual environment of EE projects. The first dimension is the energy intensity (measured, say, in terms of the ratio of energy costs to the total cost of goods sold) for the focal company initiating an EE project - the higher the energy intensity, the larger the potential payoff from EE, and the greater the ease of focusing management attention on EE. The second dimension is the level of organizational and contractual complexity of a project. Generally, the larger the number of external parties involved in a project (both financial and technical), the greater the complexity of assuring the ability to satisfy constraints necessary for successful project completion and the greater the transactions costs of contracting. After elaborating this framework and providing examples to illustrate required risk management, the paper discusses best practices for EE project risk management with illustrative case studies. Thereafter behavioral and other impediments to effective risk management are described, together with methods for overcoming these impediments. The paper then considers the role of carbon offsets as a possible source of co-financing of EE projects, and the risks associated with obtaining such carbon offsets under the CDM process. Finally, the paper considers the role of Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) in identifying profitable EE projects, in managing these projects and in reducing their risks. The paper concludes with recommendations for both companies executing EE projects as well as for international organizations like UNIDO attempting to promote EE in industry in emerging economies.","PeriodicalId":433763,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD: INSEAD Social Innovation Centre (Topic)","volume":"292 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD: INSEAD Social Innovation Centre (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1579938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The present paper addresses risk management fundamentals for energy efficiency (EE) projects in developing countries. The starting point for this paper is that there are many profitable EE projects in nearly every industrial enterprise that are simply not implemented. Four problems are often identified as the culprits for failing to harvest such projects: 1) lack of a rational and feasible approach to finance these projects; 2) lack of a rational internal management approach in the enterprise to package these projects in such a manner that they can be identified and implemented while the “plant is running”; 3) the high perceived risk of these projects; and 4) the fact that management is often simply unaware of the existence of EE projects of value. This paper is primarily focused on the third of these failure factors, risk, but touches also on the fourth factor since reducing project risk is predicated on understanding and measurement of EE benefits. The paper begins with a simple framework that emphasizes two dimensions of the organizational and contractual environment of EE projects. The first dimension is the energy intensity (measured, say, in terms of the ratio of energy costs to the total cost of goods sold) for the focal company initiating an EE project - the higher the energy intensity, the larger the potential payoff from EE, and the greater the ease of focusing management attention on EE. The second dimension is the level of organizational and contractual complexity of a project. Generally, the larger the number of external parties involved in a project (both financial and technical), the greater the complexity of assuring the ability to satisfy constraints necessary for successful project completion and the greater the transactions costs of contracting. After elaborating this framework and providing examples to illustrate required risk management, the paper discusses best practices for EE project risk management with illustrative case studies. Thereafter behavioral and other impediments to effective risk management are described, together with methods for overcoming these impediments. The paper then considers the role of carbon offsets as a possible source of co-financing of EE projects, and the risks associated with obtaining such carbon offsets under the CDM process. Finally, the paper considers the role of Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) in identifying profitable EE projects, in managing these projects and in reducing their risks. The paper concludes with recommendations for both companies executing EE projects as well as for international organizations like UNIDO attempting to promote EE in industry in emerging economies.
发展中国家能效项目的风险管理
本文论述了发展中国家能源效率项目的风险管理基础。本文的出发点是,几乎每个工业企业都有许多盈利的EE项目根本没有实施。人们通常认为,四大问题是导致此类项目未能成功的罪魁祸首:1)缺乏合理可行的方式为这些项目融资;2)企业缺乏合理的内部管理方法,将这些项目打包,使其能够在“工厂运行”时进行识别和实施;3)项目感知风险高;4)管理层通常根本不知道有价值的EE项目的存在。本文主要关注这些失败因素中的第三个,风险,但也涉及到第四个因素,因为降低项目风险是基于对EE效益的理解和衡量。本文从一个简单的框架开始,强调EE项目的组织和契约环境的两个维度。第一个维度是能源强度(以能源成本占销售商品总成本的比例来衡量)——能源强度越高,能源效率的潜在回报就越大,管理层越容易将注意力集中在能源效率上。第二个维度是项目的组织和合同复杂性水平。一般来说,项目(包括财务和技术)中涉及的外部各方越多,确保满足成功完成项目所必需的约束的能力的复杂性就越大,合同的交易成本也就越大。在详细阐述该框架并提供示例来说明所需的风险管理之后,本文通过说明性案例研究讨论了EE项目风险管理的最佳实践。然后,描述了有效风险管理的行为和其他障碍,以及克服这些障碍的方法。然后,本文考虑了碳补偿作为绿色能源项目联合融资的一个可能来源的作用,以及在清洁发展机制进程下获得这种碳补偿的相关风险。最后,本文考虑了能源服务公司(esco)在确定有利可图的节能项目、管理这些项目和降低风险方面的作用。本文最后对执行电子电气项目的公司以及试图在新兴经济体的工业中推广电子电气的工发组织等国际组织提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信